On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Perry Greenfield wrote:
> I'm not sure I'm crazy about leaving final decision making for a
> board. A board may be a good way of carefully considering the issues,
> and it could make it's own recommendation (with a sufficient
> majority). But in the end I think one
Hi Pearu!
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Pearu Peterson
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I spent about an hour googling and didn't figure this out. Here is my
>> setup.py:
>>
>> setup
Hi Sturla,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> Den 08.03.2011 05:05, skrev Dan Halbert:
>> Thanks, that's a good suggestion. I have not written Fortran since 1971,
>> but it's come a long way. I was a little worried about the row-major vs
>> column-major issue, but perhaps that
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 03/11/2011 09:13 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> On 03/11/2011 07:57 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 19:58, O
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 19:58, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I spent about an hour googling and didn't figure this out. Here is my
>> setup.py:
>>
>> setup(
>> name = &qu
Hi,
I spent about an hour googling and didn't figure this out. Here is my setup.py:
setup(
name = "libqsnake",
cmdclass = {'build_ext': build_ext},
version = "0.1",
packages = [
'qsnake',
'qsnake.calculators',
'qsnake.calculators.tests',
'qsnake.dat
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:00:47 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>> I just noticed that the Trac wiki is not displaying updates to files
>>> kept in the source tree, for example
>>> http://project
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi Rick!
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Rick Muller wrote:
>> Can someone help me replace a slow expression with a faster one based on
>> tensordot? I've read the documentation and I'm still confused.
&g
Hi Rick!
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Rick Muller wrote:
> Can someone help me replace a slow expression with a faster one based on
> tensordot? I've read the documentation and I'm still confused.
>
> I have two matrices b and d. b is n x m and d is m x m. I want to replace
> the expression
>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Joshua Holbrook
wrote:
> This is awesome! I love github. I really wanted to champion for its
> use at the BoF but unfortunately missed it.
Indeed, that's awesome. I should say finally! :)
Ondrej
___
NumPy-Discussion mai
Hi Keith!
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Keith Goodman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was always using something like
>>
>> abs(x-y) < eps
>>
>> or
>>
>> (abs(x-y) < eps).all()
&
Hi,
I was always using something like
abs(x-y) < eps
or
(abs(x-y) < eps).all()
but today I needed to also make sure this works for larger numbers,
where I need to compare relative errors, so I found this:
http://www.cygnus-software.com/papers/comparingfloats/comparingfloats.htm
and wrote thi
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 23:34, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> The only mention of the _import_array() in the documentation that I
>> found is here:
>>
>> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/c-api.array.html#NO_IMP
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> [...]
>>> still alive
>>> Segmentation fault
>>>
>>&
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
[...]
>> still alive
>> Segmentation fault
>>
>>
>>
>> What puzzles me is that there is no debugging print statement just
>> b
Hi,
I am getting a segfault in PyArray_SimpleNewFromData in Cython. I am
trying to debug it for the last 4 hours, but still absolutely no clue,
so I am posting it here, maybe someone knows where the problem is:
cdef ndarray array_double_c2numpy(double *A, int len):
from numpy import empty
2009/4/13 Stéfan van der Walt :
> 2009/4/13 Eric Firing :
>>
>> Stéfan, or other git-users,
>>
>> One feature of hg that I use frequently is "hg serve", the builtin web
>> server. I use it for two purposes: for temporary local publishing
>> (e.g., in place of using ssh--sometimes it is quicker and
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 7:13 PM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> Eric Firing wrote:
>> It probably does--it is written in python.
>>
>
> Yes, but it is just a script to call git-daemon. I am somewhat doubtful
> that it would work on windows, but I would love being proven wrong :)
It uses os.fork() whic
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> In bzr (and as far as I see, also in hg), this kind of history
> rewriting is near impossible, so the best you can do is make a merge
> commit and leave all that history in there, visible in the 'second
> level' log (indented in the text vi
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> Why not try asking on mercur...@selenic.com (gmane.comp.version-
> control.mercurial.general)
Done:
http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2009-April/025131.html
O.
___
Numpy-discussion maili
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:45 PM, David Cournapeau
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On
> * I use Python for a bunch of other stuff Matlab is not suitable for --
> This is my argument about usability and tool support. A few years back,
> CVS was a standard, now SVN is. I like that I can use the same tool to
> contribute to a whole bunch of OS projects, and I use it to manage all
> my
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:07 AM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> Eric Firing wrote:
>>
>> This is simply wrong. Mercurial uses hard links for cloning a repo that
>> is on the same disk, so it is faster and much more space-efficient than
>> copying the files.
>
> Yes, but maybe Ondrej talks about an old
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:45 PM, David Cournapeau
>> wrote:
>>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>> It is maybe easier to learn how to work with different clones, but
>>>> onc
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:45 PM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> It is maybe easier to learn how to work with different clones, but
>> once you start working with lots of patches and you need to reclone
>> all the time, then it's the wrong ap
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:25 PM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>> So, for my
>> style, working with different clones instead of branches seems easier.
>>
>
> Yes, it is. There is no denying that git makes it more difficult for
> this workflow, and that git is more difficul
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Andrew Straw wrote:
> Matthieu Brucher wrote:
>>> One thing about git-svn is that this is not really needed if you just
>>> use git and I installed git from source on many linuxes and clusters
>>> and it just works, as it is just pure C. I usually just use git-svn
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Matthieu Brucher
wrote:
> 2009/4/9 David Cournapeau :
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Matthieu Brucher
>> wrote:
>>> 2009/4/9 David Cournapeau :
>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>&
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:04 AM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but in fact the staging area (if this is what you mean) is in
>> every VCS, only it's hidden, except git, where it is made explicit.
>>
>
> I am not sure the stag
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:04 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>
> Do you have any windows developers (I am sorry, I am not familiar at
> all with sympy)?
Not much.
>
> My main concern with git are:
> -
2009/4/7 Stéfan van der Walt :
> 2009/4/6 Ondrej Certik :
>>> FWIW, I tend to agree that Hg is less disruptive than git when coming
>>> from svn, at least for the simple tasks (I don't know hg enough to have
>>> a really informed opinion for more advanced workfl
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:59 PM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> Eric Firing wrote:
>>
>> I agree. The PEP does not show overwhelming superiority (or, arguably,
>> even mild superiority) of any alternative
>
> I think this PEP was poorly written. You can't see any of the
> advantage/differences of the
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:08 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to continue cleaning the setup.py from numpy/core, and
> there is one test that I can't make sense of: the denormal thing
> (testcode_mathlib function). The svn log has no information on it (its
> presence goes back to
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Sumant S.R. Oemrawsingh
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a problem with looping over numpy arrays in C. I modify the array
> in-place (and return None), but after modification, the array doesn't seem
> to play nice any more.
>
> Below, I have the C code for a function
Hi,
I finally found time to upload the numpy 1.2.1 to Debian unstable
(currently it's in incoming: http://incoming.debian.org/). The package
is lintian clean, but there is one test that failed for me in chroot.
I'll wait until it gets to mirrors and then try it on my laptop and
report a bug (I upl
Hi,
I have a shiny new computer with 8 cores and numpy still takes forever
to compile --- is there a way to compile it in parallel (make -j9)?
Do distutils allow that? If not, let's move to some build system that
allows that? Just wanted to check if there is some reason for that,
apart from patch
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>> CMake does handle this automatically.
>> E.g. if include directories are changed (which you do by editing a
>> CMakeLists.txt or the cmake cache), all files which are affected by the are
>> rebuilt. If some library changes, everything linking
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> That's exactly what I don't like about cmake - it means you can't
>>> produce accurate builds (you need to rerun cmake everytime you change
>>> the configuration or
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Collette wrote:
> =
> Announcing HDF5 for Python (h5py) 1.1
> =
>
> What is h5py?
> -
>
> HDF5 for Python (h5py) is a general-purpose Python interface to the
> Hierarchical D
> That's exactly what I don't like about cmake - it means you can't
> produce accurate builds (you need to rerun cmake everytime you change
> the configuration or dependencies, whereas this is automatic with
> scons/waf). It also have (used to have) very poor documentation unless
> you buy the boo
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>> Yes, I am investigating cmake, it's pretty cool. I wrote some macros
>> for cython etc. What I like about cmake is that it is cross platform
>> and it just produces makefiles on linux, or visual studio files (or
>> whatever) on windows. Whe
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:10 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>>> Sorry for the confusion: numscons is NOT the preferred build system.
>>> The current numpy.distutils extensions, as shipped b
Hi David,
> Sorry for the confusion: numscons is NOT the preferred build system.
> The current numpy.distutils extensions, as shipped by numpy, is the
> preferred one. Numscons is more an experiment, if you want.
Ah, I see, thanks for the clarification.
>> So is it supposed to be in Debian?
>
>
Hi,
I have couple beginners questions about numscons. What is the
preferred build system for numpy now, is it numscons? The README
doesn't mention numscons, so I am a bit confused what the future plan
is.
Also by doing:
$ python setupscons.py install
Running from numpy source directory.
Tracebac
Hi James,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:11 AM, James Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in contributing to the port of NumPy to Python 3. Who
> I should coordinate effort with?
>
> I have started at the Python end of the problem (as opposed to
> http://www.scipy.org/Python3k), e.g. I have sever
Hi,
I just discovered a new whohas command in Debian, that can show a
package in virtually all important distributions (Arch, Debian,
Fedora, Gentoo, openSUSE, Slackware (and
linuxpackages.net), Source Mage, Ubuntu, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD,
Fink and MacPorts distributions).
So for example SymP
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:05:57 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>>> Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:15:43 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:15:43 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> Just to make it clear -- I think the docs should not be generated in
>>> the tarball -- only
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:35 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
>> 2008/12/20 Ondrej Certik :
>>> So we thought with Stefan that maybe a simpler solution is just to fix
>>> the ./setup sdist (or how you crea
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Nicolas ROUX wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About the missing doc directory in the windows install in latest numpy
> release, could you please add it ?
> (please see below the previous thread)
Well, this is a serious problem, so it should definitely be fixed, see here:
http:/
Hi,
while packaging the new version of numpy, I realized that it is
missing a documentation. I just checked with Stefan on Jabber and he
thinks
it should be rather a trivial fix. Do you Jarrod think you could
please release a new tarball with the doc directory?
The problem is that debian (and I g
Hi,
the details including a test script are at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505999
Thanks,
Ondrej
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Robert Cimrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Robert Cimrman <
> So the timing raises a lot. For obvious reasons, that's the overhead
> of the profiler. But the problem is that then the timings just don't
> fit, e.g. if I sum the total time spent in subfunctions, it doesn't
> account for all the time printed on the respective line in the parent
> function.
>
>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Robert Cimrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It requires Cython and a C compiler to build. I'm still debating
&
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Robert Cimrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Robert Kern wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13, Arnar Flatberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> That would make me an extremely happy user, I've been looking for this for
>>> years!
>>> I can't imagine I'
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 18:09, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13, Arna
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13, Arnar Flatberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That would make me an extremely happy user, I've been looking for this for
>> years!
>> I can't imagine I'm the only one who profiles some hundred li
Hi Pauli!
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Pauli Virtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I finished the first iteration of incorporating material from Travis
> Oliphant's "Guide to Numpy" to the Sphinxy reference guide we were
> constructing in the Doc marathon.
>
> Result is here: (th
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is my personal recollection of the documentation BoF. Feel free to
> comment or correct the text below.
>
> Regards
> Stéfan
>
>
> Summary of the Documentation Birds-of-a-Feather Session
> =
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 04:28:55PM -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>>> That said, what kind of problems do you have in mind?
>
> Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>> wht I am most worried about is not being able to enter the
>> symbol, bec
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Dalke wrote:
>> When would this "with float ... " considered valid?
>
> [long posting]
>
> Oh h... what have I done ... *g*
>
> Slow down, please. For now there are no concrete plans what-so-ever to
> implement th
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > Ok, in the current state, you don't know either what's going to
>> happen. If you write
>>
>> In [1]: x/2*3/4
>>
>> you h
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Andrew Dalke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> with Andrew permission, I am starting a new thread, where our
>> discussion is ontopic. :)
>
> Though I want to point out that without s
Hi,
with Andrew's permission, I am starting a new thread, where our
discussion is ontopic. :)
My original question was, that I would like to override 1+1 to return
MyClass(1, 1) or something.
Robert said it would break other libraries and Andrew said this:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Andrew
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Andrew Dalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2008, at 12:00 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> There is some inconsistency though, for example one can override A() +
>> A(), but one cannot override 1 + 1. This could (should) be fixed
>
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [ please keep all replies to this only on the numpy list. I'm cc'ing
> the scipy ones to make others aware of the topic, but do NOT reply on
> those lists so we can have an organized thread for future referenc
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 05:43, Andrew Dalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>
>>> But you still can't remove them since they are being used inside
>>> numerictypes. That's why I
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 14:47, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 08:06, Ond
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 08:06, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Tiziano Zito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi numpy-devs, I was the one repo
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Tiziano Zito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi numpy-devs, I was the one reporting the original bug about missing ATLAS
> support in the debian lenny python-numpy package. AFAICT the source
> python-numpy package in etch (numpy version 1.0.1) does not require
> atlas
Hi,
we have this problem in Debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489726
The problem is that numpy should not depend on atlas unconditionally,
yet it should allow it for users that have it.
I am not an expert in blas/lapack/atlas and it's Debian packaging much
(I know some pe
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Anne Archibald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/7 Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 14:37, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> what is the current plan with arr
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to package numpy 1.1 and upload it to Debian, all worked fine,
> I installed the package and:
>
&
Hi,
what is the current plan with array and matrix with regard of calculating
sin(A)
? I.e. elementwise vs sin(A) = Q*sin(D)*Q^T? Is the current approach
(elementwise for array and Q*sin(D)*Q^T for matrix) the way to go?
We are solving the same problem in SymPy:
http://groups.google.com/group/
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Referring to
>> http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/798
>>
>> `piecewise` uses `empty` to
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Referring to
> http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/798
>
> `piecewise` uses `empty` to allocate output memory. If the conditions
> do not sufficiently cover the output, then raw memory is returned,
> e.g.,
>
> {{{
>
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:08 PM, David Huard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/14 David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:58 -1000, Eric Firing wrote:
>> >
>> > What does that mean? How does one know when there is a consensus?
>>
>> There can be a system to make this
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I read the recent flamebate about unittests, formal procedures for a
>> commit etc. and it was amusing. :)
>> I think Stefan is right about the uni
Hi,
I read the recent flamebate about unittests, formal procedures for a
commit etc. and it was amusing. :)
I think Stefan is right about the unit tests. I also think that Travis
is right that there is no formal procedure that can assure what we
want.
I think that a solution is a patch review. Ev
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Jarrod,
>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jarrod,
>
> any news with the 1.0.5? If you have same prerelease, I'd like to test
> it. Debian has just moved from python2.4 to python2.5 yesterday, so
> I'd like to test numpy in a
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16/04/2008, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Charles R Harris
>
> > > Oh, and making the transition will be made a lot easier by having a
> > > complete
> > > set o
Hi Jarrod,
any news with the 1.0.5? If you have same prerelease, I'd like to test
it. Debian has just moved from python2.4 to python2.5 yesterday, so
I'd like to test numpy in advance, I am sure there will be some issues
to fix.
Ondrej
___
Numpy-discuss
Hi,
since there was so much discussion whether bzr or hg, Mercurial has
now free hosting too:
http://freehg.org/
also Mercurial 1.0 was finally released yesterday.
Bzr has Launchpad, that's one of the (main) reasons ipython is
investigating it, so I am still learning how to use bzr, but it's no
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any student interested in this should quickly respond on the list;
> > such a project would likely be co-mentored by people on the Numpy and
> >
M
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy 1:1.0.4: numpy.average() returns the
> wrong result with weights
>
>
>
> > Ondrej Certik wrote:
> >> I'll add it. I registered on the trac, as required, but I am still
> >> denied, when filling my username an
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Travis E. Oliphant
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > more details in this bug report.
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=467095
> >
> > The bug rep
Hi,
more details in this bug report.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=467095
The bug report offers a fix for this problem. It seems to me this is
not fixed even in the latest svn.
Thanks,
Ondrej
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-
On Feb 5, 2008 11:52 AM, Gael Varoquaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:48:38AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > I use Cython, mostly for the same reasons Gael is using ctypes - it's
> > trivial.
>
> Actually, when I want to do
On Feb 5, 2008 11:23 AM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:15:29AM +0100, Sebastian Haase wrote:
> >
> >> Can ctypes do this ?
> >>
> >
> > No. Ctypes is only a way of loading C (and not C++) libraries in Python.
> > That makes it ver
> > Better solution is to keep the tags in a Mercurial Queues patch, as I did.
> Good. As I said, I know bzr much better than hg, and I did the mirror to
> get something started (and get used to hg, too). Since you know hg, it
> is better than you maintain this for a while for people to try it out.
On Jan 27, 2008 6:57 PM, Pauli Virtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> la, 2008-01-19 kello 14:15 +0900, David Cournapeau kirjoitti:
> > Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> > > pe, 2008-01-18 kello 18:06 +0900, David Cournapeau kirjoitti:
> > >> Hi there,
> > >>
> > >> I got a mercurial mirror of numpy ava
Hi,
if you want to play with Mercurial now (without forcing everyone else
to leave svn), I suggest this:
http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/hgsvn
I tried that and it works. It's a very easy way to create a hg mirror
at your computer. And then you can take this
as the official upstream repository
On Jan 6, 2008 12:55 AM, Bill Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 8:25 AM, Stefan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I recall something you said to David last week, regarding merges with
> > SVN: that a person never knows how to do it until *after* you've done
> > it! We of
On Jan 5, 2008 8:15 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 12:08 PM, David M. Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 4, 2008, at 13:58 , Fernando Perez wrote:
> >
> > > My vote so far is for hg, for performance reasons but also partly
> > > because sage and sympy alread
On Jan 4, 2008 10:05 PM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 5:36 AM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
>
> >
> > A quick google for benchmarks show that a year ago, hg was a bit faster and
> > generated smaller repositories than bzr, but I don't think the
On Jan 4, 2008 5:56 PM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 1:30 AM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I like Mercurial and use it a lot, but I'm not convinced we have enough
> > developers and code to justify the pain of changing the VCS at this time.
>
> Imagine the pain in the other direction, which was my experience :) I
> actually did not believe at first that it was so bad, and thought I was
> doing something wrong. At least, it certainly convinced me that SVN was
> not easier than DVCS.
It would made me sick. :)
> I am not familiar with sy
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
