Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

Hi, On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:56:52 -0700, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti: > [clip] >> As long as we can fit under the 1 gig size limit then GH pages seems >> like the best option so far... it's reliable, widely understood, and all >> of the limits be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

Hi, On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 >> hours: >> >> https://github.

[Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

Hi, The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 hours: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439 This has happened before: https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org/issues/187#issue-186426408 I think it was down for about 24 hours that time. >From the num

[Numpy-discussion] Building with Clang on Windows?

Hi, Has anyone succeeded in building numpy with Clang on Windows? Or, building any other Python extension with Clang on Windows? I'd love to hear about how you did it... Cheers, Matthew ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org htt

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Overhead

Hi, On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Sebastian K wrote: > Yes you are right. There is no need to add that line. I deleted it. But the > measured heap peak is still the same. You're applying the naive matrix multiplication algorithm, which is ideal for minimizing memory use during the computation

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Overhead

Hi, On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Sebastian K wrote: > Thank you for your answer. > For example a very simple algorithm is a matrix multiplication. I can see > that the heap peak is much higher for the numpy version in comparison to a > pure python 3 implementation. > The heap is measured with

[Numpy-discussion] Daily numpy wheel builds - prefer to per-commit builds?

Hi, I've been working to get daily travis-ci cron-job manylinux builds working for numpy and scipy wheels. They are now working OK: https://travis-ci.org/MacPython/numpy-wheels https://travis-ci.org/MacPython/scipy-wheels https://7933911d6844c6c53a7d-47bd50c35cd79bd838daf386af554a83.ssl.cf2.rac

Re: [Numpy-discussion] automatically avoiding temporary arrays

Hi, On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > Ah, that wheel would be a huge help. Most of the packages I have as > dependencies for this project were compiled against v1.10, so I am hoping > that there won't be too big of a problem. I don't think so - the problems generally arise

Re: [Numpy-discussion] automatically avoiding temporary arrays

Hi, On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Benjamin Root > wrote: >> >> What's the timeline for the next release? I have the perfect usecase for >> this (Haversine calculation on large arrays that takes up ~33% of one of my >> processing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Removal of some numpy files

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 7:48 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > tools/win32build is used to build the so-called superpack installers, which > we don't build anymore AFAIK > > tools/numpy-macosx-installer is used to build the .dmg for numpy (also not > used anymore AFAIK). No, we aren't using the .dmg

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> A recent post to the wheel-builders mailing list pointed out some >> links to places providing free PowerPC hosting for open source >> projects, if they agree to a submitted request: > > The debian project has some powerpc machines (and we sti

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

Hi, On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Matthew

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Matthew Bret

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> A recent post to the wheel-builders mailing list pointed out some >> links to places providing free PowerPC hosting for o

[Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

Hey, A recent post to the wheel-builders mailing list pointed out some links to places providing free PowerPC hosting for open source projects, if they agree to a submitted request: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/wheel-builders/2017-February/000257.html It would be good to get some testing go

Re: [Numpy-discussion] composing Euler rotation matrices

https://pypi.python.org/pypi/transforms3d - and in particular you might get some use from symbolic versions of the transformations, e.g. here : https://github.com/matthew-brett/transforms3d/blob/master/transforms3d/derivations/eulerangles.py It's really easy to mix up the conventions, as

[Numpy-discussion] Numpy development version wheels for testing

l the travis-ci containers, not just the Precise container; * manylinux wheels don't need any extra packages installed by apt, because they are self-contained. There's an example of use at https://github.com/matthew-brett/nibabel/blob/use-pre/.travis.yml#L23 Cheers, Matthew [1] http

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] NumPy 1.12.0 release

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Matthew Brett wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >>> Charles R Harris wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I'm pleased to a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.12.0 release

Hi, On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > Charles R Harris wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm pleased to announce the NumPy 1.12.0 release. This release supports >> Python 2.7 and 3.4-3.6. Wheels for all supported Python versions may be >> downloaded from PiPY >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about long doubles on ppc64el

Hi, On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Thomas Caswell wrote: > Folks, > > Over at h5py we are trying to get a release out and have discovered (via > debian) that on ppc64el there is an apparent disagreement between the size > of a native long double according to hdf5 and numpy. > > For all of the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Wheel files for PPC64

Hi, On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Leonardo Bianconi wrote: > Hi all! > > > > I realized that there is no “whl” files for PPC64 > (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/numpy/1.12.0b1), which makes numpy be compiled > when installing it with pip. It is causing a low performance on this > architecture wh

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.12.0b1 released

Hi, On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Matti Picus wrote: > Congrats to all on the release.Two questions: > > Is there a guide to building standard wheels for NumPy? I don't think so - there is a repository that we use to build the wheels, that has the Windows, OSX and manyllinux recipes for the s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.11.2 released

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm pleased to announce the release of Numpy 1.11.2. This release supports > Python 2.6 - 2.7, and 3.2 - 3.5 and fixes bugs and regressions found in > Numpy 1.11.1. Wheels for Linux, Windows, and OSX can be found on PyPI. > Sou

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Accelerate or OpenBLAS for numpy / scipy wheels?

Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Mo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Accelerate or OpenBLAS for numpy / scipy wheels?

Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I just succeeded in getting an automated dual arch build of numpy and >> scipy, using OpenBLAS. See the l

[Numpy-discussion] Accelerate or OpenBLAS for numpy / scipy wheels?

Hi, I just succeeded in getting an automated dual arch build of numpy and scipy, using OpenBLAS. See the last three build jobs in these two build matrices: https://travis-ci.org/matthew-brett/numpy-wheels/builds/140388119 https://travis-ci.org/matthew-brett/scipy-wheels/builds/140684673 Tests

[Numpy-discussion] Pip download stats for numpy

Hi, I just ran a query on pypi downloads [1] using the BigQuery interface to pypi stats [2]. It lists the numpy files downloaded from pypi via a pip install, over the last two weeks, ordered by the number of downloads: 1 100595 numpy-1.11.0.tar.gz 2 97754 numpy-1.11.0-cp27-cp27mu-manylinux1_x8

Re: [Numpy-discussion] scipy 0.18 release candidate 1

Hi, On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Evgeni Burovski wrote: > Hi, > > I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release > candidate for scipy 0.18.0. > Please try this release and report any issues on Github tracker, > https://github.com/scipy/scipy, or scipy-dev mailing list. > Sourc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Datarray 0.1.0 release

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> If you like the general idea, and you don't mind the pandas >> dependency, `xray` is a much better choice for production code right >> now,

[Numpy-discussion] Datarray 0.1.0 release

Hi, I just released a new version of the Datarray package: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/datarray/0.1.0 https://github.com/BIDS/datarray It's a very lightweight implementation of arrays with labeled axes and ticks, that allows you to do stuff like: >>> narr = DataArray(np.zeros((1,2,3)), axes=('

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Integers to integer powers, let's make a decision

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:47 PM, wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've made a new post so that we can make an explicit decision. AFAICT, >>> the two proposals ar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Integers to integer powers, let's make a decision

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I've made a new post so that we can make an explicit decision. AFAICT, the >> two proposals are >> >> Integers to negative integer powers raise an error. >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Integers to integer powers

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Alan Isaac wrote: > On 5/24/2016 1:19 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote: >> >> the int ** 2 example feels quite compelling to me > > > > Yes, but that one case is trivial: a*a Right, but you'd have to know to change your code when numpy makes this change. Your code will s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding the Linux Wheels for old releases breaks builds

Hi, On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Christian Aichinger wrote: > Hi! > The addition of the Linux Wheels broke the build process of several of our > Debian packages, which rely on NumPy installed inside virtualenvs. The > problem stems from the pre-compiled shared libraries included in the Whee

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > 2016-04-22 20:17 GMT+02:00 Matthew Brett : >> >> The github releases idea sounds intriguing. Do you have any >> experience with that? Are there good examples other than the API >> documentation? >> &

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > 2016-04-20 16:57 GMT+02:00 Matthew Brett : >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Olivier Grisel >> wrote: >>> Thanks, >>> >>> I think next we could upgrade the travis configuration of numpy and >&

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

Hi, On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Jens Nielsen wrote: > Thanks > > I can confirm that the new narrow unicode build wheels of Scipy works as > expected for my project. > @Oliver Grisel Thanks for finding the Travis issue it's probably worth > considering switching the Travis build to 2.7.11 to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > Thanks, > > I think next we could upgrade the travis configuration of numpy and > scipy to build and upload manylinux1 wheels to > http://travis-dev-wheels.scipy.org/ for downstream project to test > against the master branch of numpy and sc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > I think that would be very useful, e.g. for downstream projects to > check that they work properly with old versions using a simple pip > install command on their CI workers. Done for numpy 1.6.0 through 1.10.4, scipy 0.9 through scipy 0.16

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

Hi, On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Jens Nielsen wrote: >> I have tested the new cp27m wheels and they seem to work great. >> >> @Matthew I am using the: >> >> ``` >> sudo: required >> d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Jens Nielsen wrote: > I have tested the new cp27m wheels and they seem to work great. > > @Matthew I am using the: > > ``` > sudo: required > dist: trusty > > images mentioned here https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/ci-environment/. As > far as I can see you are doing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Jens Nielsen wrote: >>> I have tried testing the wheels in a project that runs test

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

Hi, On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Jens Nielsen wrote: >> I have tried testing the wheels in a project that runs tests on Travis's >> Trusty infrastructure which. The wheels work great for python 3

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Jonathan Helmus wrote: > > > On 4/14/16 3:11 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Jonathan Helmus >>> wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Jens Nielsen wrote: > I have tried testing the wheels in a project that runs tests on Travis's > Trusty infrastructure which. The wheels work great for python 3.5 and saves > us several minuts of runtime. > > However, I am having trouble using the wheels on python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Jonathan Helmus wrote: >> >> >> On 4/14/16 1:26 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Benjamin Root >&g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Jonathan Helmus wrote: > > > On 4/14/16 1:26 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Benjamin Root >> wrote: >>> >>> Are we going to have to have documentation somewh

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

Hi, On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > Are we going to have to have documentation somewhere making it clear that > the numpy wheel shouldn't be used in a conda environment? Not that I would > expect this issue to come up all that often, but I could imagine a scenario > where

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

Hi, On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Jens Nielsen wrote: > I have tried testing the wheels in a project that runs tests on Travis's > Trusty infrastructure which. The wheels work great for python 3.5 and saves > us several minuts of runtime. > > However, I am having trouble using the wheels on py

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Oscar Benjamin wrote: > On 13 April 2016 at 20:15, Matthew Brett wrote: >> Done. If y'all are on linux, and you have pip >= 8.11, you should >> now see this kind of thing: > > That's fantastic. Thanks Matt! > > I jus

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Peter Cock >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Robert T. McGibbon >>> wrote: >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

Hi, On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Peter Cock wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Robert T. McGibbon >> wrote: >>> I suspect that many of the maintainers of major scipy-ecosystem projects are >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Using OpenBLAS for manylinux wheels

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > I updated the issue: > > https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS-CI/issues/10#issuecomment-206195714 > > The random test_nanmedian_all_axis failure is unrelated to openblas > and should be ignored. It looks like all is well now, at least for the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ndarray.T2 for 2D transpose

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Ian Henriksen > wrote: >> >> Here's another example that I've seen catch people now and again. >> >> A = np.random.rand(100, 100) >> b = np.random.rand(10) >> A * b.T > > > typo? that was supposed to be > > b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Using OpenBLAS for manylinux wheels

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > Olivier Grisel and I are working on building and testing manylinux > wheels for numpy and scipy. > > We first thought that we should use ATLAS BLAS, but Olivier found that > my build of these could be very

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

Hi, On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Peter Cock wrote: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Peter Cock >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Robert T. McGibbon >>> wrote: >>>> I suspec

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Peter Cock wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Robert T. McGibbon > wrote: >> I suspect that many of the maintainers of major scipy-ecosystem projects are >> aware of these (or other similar) travis wheel caches, but would guess that >> the pool of travis-c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Using OpenBLAS for manylinux wheels

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > I would like to see OpenBLAS support for numpy on windows. The latest > OpenBLAS windows builds numpy support for are on > https://bitbucket.org/carlkl/mingw-w64-for-python/downloads now. Scipy > wheels should work regardless if numpy was bui

[Numpy-discussion] Using OpenBLAS for manylinux wheels

]: source test_manylinux.sh We have worried in the past about the reliability of OpenBLAS, but I find these tests reassuring. Are there any other tests of OpenBLAS that we should run to assure ourselves that it is safe to use? Matthew [1] https://github.com/matthew-brett/manylinux-builds/issues

[Numpy-discussion] ATLAS build errors

.TestRegression) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/travis/build/matthew-brett/manylinux-testing/venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/tests/test_regression.py", line 56, in test_svd_build u, s, vh = linalg.svd(a) File "/home/travis/build/matthe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:30 PM, wrote: >> [...] >>> AFAIK, numpy doesn't provide access to BLAS/LAPACK. scipy does. statsmodels >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

Hi, On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:30 PM, wrote: > [...] >> AFAIK, numpy doesn't provide access to BLAS/LAPACK. scipy does. statsmodels >> is linking to the installed BLAS/LAPACK in cython code through scipy. So far >> we haven't seen problems

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:29 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Summary: >> >> I propose that we upload Windows wheels to pypi. The wheels are >> likely to be stable an

[Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels, built, but should we deploy?

braries, such as OpenBLAS or BLIS (see [6]). I'm posting here hoping for your feedback... Cheers, Matthew [1] https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5479 [2] https://gist.github.com/dstufft/1dda9a9f87ee7121e0ee [3] https://ci.appveyor.com/project/matthew-brett/np-wheel-builde

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

Hi, On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Freddy Rietdijk wrote: > On Nix we also had trouble with OpenBLAS 0.2.15. Version 0.2.14 did not > cause any segmentation faults so we reverted to that version. > https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/5620 > > (hopefully this time the e-mail gets through) In

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Windows wheels for testing

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Jonathan Helmus wrote: > > > On 2/12/16 10:23 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:18 PM, R Schumacher wrote: >>> >>> At 03:45 PM 2/12/2016, you wrote: >>>> >>>> PS C:\tmp>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Windows wheels for testing

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:18 PM, R Schumacher wrote: > At 03:45 PM 2/12/2016, you wrote: >> >> PS C:\tmp> c:\Python35\python -m venv np-testing >> PS C:\tmp> .\np-testing\Scripts\Activate.ps1 >> (np-testing) PS C:\tmp> pip install -f >> https://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/scipy_installers/atlas_builds n

[Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Windows wheels for testing

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:15 PM, R Schumacher wrote: > At 03:06 PM 2/12/2016, you wrote: > >> Any feedback would be very useful, > > > Sure, here's a little: > > C:\Python34\Scripts>pip install -f > https://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/scipy_installers/atlas_builds numpy > Requirement already satisfied (

[Numpy-discussion] Windows wheels for testing

Hi, We're talking about putting up Windows wheels for numpy on pypi - here: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5479 I've built some wheels that might be suitable - available here: http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/scipy_installers/atlas_builds/ I'd be very grateful if y'all would test these. They

[Numpy-discussion] Hook in __init__.py to let distributors patch numpy

Hi, Over at https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5479 we're discussing Windows wheels. On thing that we would like to be able to ship Windows wheels, is to be able to put some custom checks into numpy when you build the wheels. Specifically, for Windows, we're building on top of ATLAS BLAS / LA

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 09.02.2016 04:59, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett >>> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 P

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Linking other libm-Implementation

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Daπid wrote: > On 8 February 2016 at 18:36, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> I would be highly suspicious that this speed comes at the expense of >> accuracy... My impression is that there's a lot of room to make >> speed/accuracy tradeoffs in these functions, and modern

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > [...] >> I can't replicate the segfault with manylinux wheels and scipy. On >> the other hand, I get a new test error for numpy from manylinux, scipy >&

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Evgeni Burovski > wrote: >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Evgeni Burovski >> Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:56 AM >> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-dist

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

of openblas instead of its cpu > detection. > The cpuinfo of Oliver indicates its at least a sandy bridge, and ivy > bridge is be sandy bridge compatible. > Is an up to date version of openblas used? I used the latest release, v0.2.15: https:/

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Evgeni Burovski wrote: > >> numpy.show_config() shows the places that numpy found the libraries at >> build time. In the case of the manylinux wheel builds, I put openblas >> at /usr/local , but the place the wheel should be loading openblas >> from is /.libs. Fo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

> > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As some of you may have seen, Robert McGibbon and Nathaniel have just >> guided a PEP for multi-distribution Linux wheels past the approval >> process over on distutils-sig: >> >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

Hi, On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:29 AM, Daπid wrote: > > On 6 February 2016 at 21:26, Matthew Brett wrote: >> >> >> pip install -f https://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/manylinux numpy scipy >> python -c 'import numpy; numpy.test()' >> python -c 'import sc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

Hi Nadav, On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > (This is not relevant to the main topic of the thread, but FYI I think the > recarray issues are fixed in 1.10.4.) > > On Feb 7, 2016 11:10 PM, "Nadav Horesh" wrote: >> >> I have atlas-lapack-base installed via pacman (required

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Nadav Horesh wrote: > Thank you fo reminding me, it is OK now: > $ python -c 'import numpy; print(numpy.__config__.show())' > > lapack_opt_info: > library_dirs = ['/usr/local/lib'] > language = c > libraries = ['openblas'] > define_macros = [('HAVE_

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

Hi, On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Nadav Horesh wrote: > The reult tests of numpy 1.10.4 installed from source: > > OK (KNOWNFAIL=4, SKIP=6) > > > I think I use openblas, as it is installed instead the normal blas/cblas. Thanks again for the further tests. What do you get for: python -c 'impo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Nadav Horesh wrote: > Test platform: python 3.4.1 on archlinux x86_64 > > scipy test: OK > > OK (KNOWNFAIL=97, SKIP=1626) > > > numpy tests: Failed on long double and int128 tests, and got one error: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python3.

[Numpy-discussion] Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

Hi, As some of you may have seen, Robert McGibbon and Nathaniel have just guided a PEP for multi-distribution Linux wheels past the approval process over on distutils-sig: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0513/ The PEP includes a docker image on which y'all can build wheels which match the PE

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.0b2 released

Hi, On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > I hope I am pleased to announce the Numpy 1.11.0b2 release. The first beta > was a damp squib due to missing files in the released source files, this > release fixes that. The new source filese may be downloaded from > so

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Steve Waterbury wrote: > On 01/15/2016 05:19 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Steve Waterbury >> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/15/2016 05:07 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >>>>> >>>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Steve Waterbury wrote: > On 01/15/2016 05:07 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >>> >>> I attribute >>> some of the conda-ignoring to "NIH" and, to some extent, >>> possibly defensiveness (I would be defensive too if I had

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

Hi, On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Steve Waterbury wrote: > On 01/15/2016 04:08 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> >> So, again, I love conda for what it can do when it works well. I only >> take exception to the notion that it can address *all* problems, because >> there are some problems that it jus

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote: >>> Also, you have the problem that there is one PyPi -- so where do you put >>> your nifty wheels that depend on other binary wheels? you may need to fork >>> every package you want to build :-( >> >> Is this a real problem or a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> I updated the page with more on reasons to prefer Debian packages over >> installing with pip: >> >> https://matthew-brett.github.io/pydagogue/installin

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Jan 9, 2016 10:09, "Matthew Brett" wrote: >> >> Hi Sandro, >> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> >> I wrote a page on using pip with Debian / Ubuntu here

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> Hi Sandro, >> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >>>> I wrote a page on using pip with Debian / Ubuntu here : >>>&

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

Hi Sandro, On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> I wrote a page on using pip with Debian / Ubuntu here : >> https://matthew-brett.github.io/pydagogue/installing_on_debian.html > > Speaking with my numpy debian maintainer hat on, I would really > appreciate if you dont suggest to u

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Robert McGibbon wrote: >> Both Anaconda and Canopy build on a base default Linux system so that >> the built binaries will work on many Linux systems. > > I think the base linux system is CentOS 5, and from my experience, it seems > like this approach > has worked

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

Hi, On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Robert McGibbon wrote: >> >> I'm not sure if this is the right path for numpy or not, > > > probably not -- AFAICT, the PyPa folks aren't interested in solving teh > problems we have in the scipy community

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

Hi, On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Yuxiang Wang wrote: > Dear Nathaniel, > > Gotcha. That's very helpful. Thank you so much! > > Shawn > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Yuxiang Wang wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I know that in Windows

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: second release candidate for scipy 0.17.0

Hi, On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Evgeni Burovski wrote: > Hi, > > I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second release > candidate for Scipy 0.17.0. It's two days ahead of the original > schedule: based on typical development patterns, I'd like to have two > weekends and a full work

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows build/distribute plan & MingwPy funding

Hi, On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Erik Bray wrote: > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> You probably know that building Numpy, Scipy and the rest of the Scipy Stack >> on Windows is problematic. And that there are plans to adopt the static >> MinGW-w64 based t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > A signifi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

Hi, On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > A significant segfault problem has been reported against Numpy 1.10.2 and I > want to make a quick 1.10.3 release to get it fixed. Two questions > > What exactly is the release process that has been decided on? AFAIK, I > s

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >