I am really excited to see that we have a great agenda for the BoF, I hope
that the discussion will be fruitful!
Kyle
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Fernando Perez
wrote:
> Great, thanks! And we can certainly try to either move into planning at
> the end, or plan for such afterwards.
>
> Be
on organizing,
submitting something to the conference website and I helping to gather
interested parties I would be much obliged.
Kyle
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote:
>
>> In the past I know that we have sim
I also have filed a bug report with apple in the past to fix an accelerate
bug. The key I think was to clearly demonstrate and isolate the problem
like any good bug report should have. In my case, they got back to me
within a week and the bug was fixed a week after that. The release
schedule is
s in
> the C API, but that's much more acceptable than a significant break at the
> python level.
>
> David
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Sebastian Berg > wrote:
>
>> On Mi, 2014-06-04 at 02:26 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 4, 201
Hello everyone,
As one of the co-chairs in charge of organizing the birds-of-a-feather
sesssions at the SciPy conference this year, I wanted to solicit through
the NumPy list to see if we could get enough interest to hold a NumPy
centered BoF this year. The BoF format would be up to those who wou
In the Clawpack projects (specifically the Riemann solvers) we compile
against LAPACK and the BLAS using f2py via the `--link-lapack_opt` flag.
This does cause some problems in terms of portability though, Aron Ahmadia
might be able to shed some light on this as he has looked into it most
recently
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Juan Luis Cano wrote:
>
> El 27/08/2013 17:27, "Kyle Mandli" escribió:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Juan Luis Cano
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm having some problems to properly build a module
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Juan Luis Cano wrote:
> I'm having some problems to properly build a module written in Fortran
> 90 using numpy.distutils. It only contains one subroutine, but:
>
> * If I write a .f90 file with the single subroutine (no module ..
> contains), then f2py tries to c
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:35 PM, KACVINSKY Tom wrote:
> llvm-gcc. You have to specify the right options which I can look up
> tomorrow when I'm back in the office. We don't invoke gcc directly, we use
> xcrun.
>
> On Aug 20, 2013, at 18:31, "David Cournapeau" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2
