Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 0.13.0 release

2013-10-20 Thread Juan Luis Cano
istian Brueffer + * Lars Buitinck * Evgeni Burovski + * Tim Cera * Lawrence Chan + * David Cournapeau * Draz?en Luc?anin + * Alexander J. Dunlap + * endolith * André Gaul + * Christoph Gohlke * Ralf Gommers * Alex Griffing + * Blake Griffith + * Charles Harris * Bob Helmbold + * Andreas Hilboll * Ka

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecation of financial routines

2013-09-02 Thread Juan Luis Cano
(being on a subpackage or not) and attract people to actually use them (I would bet very few are doing so as of now), then great! My proposal is moving them to a separate subpackage as a first step to their disappearance. Maybe when someone sees the move and/or the deprecation not

[Numpy-discussion] Are NEPs still a thing?

2013-09-02 Thread Juan Luis Cano
The subject speaks for itself, I was diving into NumPy source code and saw some NEPs, and I wonder if there still function as a mechanism to propose changes to NumPy, and if it is documented somewhere. ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Right way to build Fortran 90 module using numpy.distutils

2013-08-27 Thread Juan Luis Cano
El 27/08/2013 21:21, "Kyle Mandli" escribió: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Juan Luis Cano wrote: >> >> >> El 27/08/2013 17:27, "Kyle Mandli" escribió: >> >> >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Juan Luis Ca

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Right way to build Fortran 90 module using numpy.distutils

2013-08-27 Thread Juan Luis Cano
El 27/08/2013 17:27, "Kyle Mandli" escribió: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Juan Luis Cano wrote: >> >> I'm having some problems to properly build a module written in Fortran >> 90 using numpy.distutils. It only contains one subroutine, but: >>

[Numpy-discussion] Right way to build Fortran 90 module using numpy.distutils

2013-08-27 Thread Juan Luis Cano
(part of the rewrite of odeint I'm doing in SciPy). Regards Juan Luis Cano ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecation of financial routines

2013-08-19 Thread Juan Luis Cano
[clip] On 08/19/2013 01:34 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote: > On 8/19/2013 2:37 AM, Juan Luis Cano wrote: >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/2880 >> >> it was suggested that we deprecate and eventually remove the financial >> functions in NumPy > > It seems tha

[Numpy-discussion] Deprecation of financial routines

2013-08-18 Thread Juan Luis Cano
As now master is open for 1.9, following the discussion opened here https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/2880 it was suggested that we deprecate and eventually remove the financial functions in NumPy, because they pollute the main namespace and some are unimplemented. We could put them in a se

Re: [Numpy-discussion] nanmean(), nanstd() and other "missing" functions for 1.8

2013-05-01 Thread Juan Luis Cano
On 05/01/2013 04:14 PM, Daπid wrote: > On 1 May 2013 03:36, Benjamin Root wrote: >> Are there any other functions that others feel are "missing" from numpy and >> would like to see for v1.8? Let's discuss them here. > I would like to have sincos, to compute sin and cos of the same number > faster

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Purpose of this list

2013-02-15 Thread Juan Luis Cano
On 02/15/2013 06:29 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Juan Luis Cano wrote: >> Hello all, I have a brief question about the general purpose of >> Numpy-discussion. I suscribed a month ago more or less to keep an eye on >> NumPy development (and

[Numpy-discussion] Purpose of this list

2013-02-15 Thread Juan Luis Cano
arrive through the list are related to support. Whats is actually the scope/purpose of the list? I am not critizicing anyone, just asking for a clarification on this point, to manage my mail client filters etc. Best regards, Juan Luis Cano ___ NumPy