[Numpy-discussion] Cross compile flags for tdm-gcc on mingw

Hi folks, I was compiling some extensions for 32-bit python 2.5 on windows using a 64 bit gcc compiler (4.5.1). After a bit of head scratching it seems that I needed to patch numpy/distutils/mingw32ccompiler.py to add the following flags around where it says "set_executables": -m32 -static-libgc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] generalized eigenvector problem

Manuel Metz wrote: >are there any plans to implement a routine to solve the "generalized > eigenvector problem" as is done in matlab ? > see http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/ref/eig.html >>> import numpy >>> help(numpy.linalg.eig) Is it what you wanted? HTH, Jon ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A memory problem: why does mmap come up in numpy.inner?

Dan Yamins wrote: > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Charles R Harris > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > Are both python and your version of OS X fully 64 bits? > > > I'm not sure. >From python: python2.5 -c 'import platform;print platform.architecture()' ('32

[Numpy-discussion] should abs gives negative at end of integer range?

This one comes up in a Java puzzler, but applies equally to numpy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDN_EYUvUq0 >>> import numpy, sys >>> abs(numpy.array([-sys.maxint-1],numpy.int)) > 0 array([False], dtype=bool) >>> abs(numpy.array([-129,-128,-127],numpy.int8)) > 0 array([ True, False, True],

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy/SciPy Documentation Marathon 2008

Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > As for internationali(s/z)ation, we'll see who writes the most > docstrings. Indeed. There are some notes on the OLPC wiki at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Python_i18n It seems to be just a question of adding at the top of add_newdocs.py from gettext import gettext as

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy/SciPy Documentation Marathon 2008

Joe Harrington wrote: > NUMPY/SCIPY DOCUMENTATION MARATHON 2008 > On the wiki it says: "Writers should be fluent in English" In case someone is working on the dynamic docstring magic, is this a good moment to mention "internationalisation" and "world domination" in the same sentence?

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Power domain (was Re: bug in oldnumeric.ma)

Anne Archibald wrote: > 2008/5/9 Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> It seems like some strategic re-thinking may be needed in the long run, >> if not immediately. > I think in principle the right answer is to simply run whatever > underlying function, and mask any NaNs or Infs in the outpu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Uncomfortable with matrix change

Timothy Hochberg wrote: > +0 > > My personal opinion is that current matrix class is pretty useless and > the change won't help much from my point of view. My preference would > be to leave the matrix class alone, design a new matrix class, with a > different name, for 1.2 and then deprecate the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] bug in oldnumeric.ma

Anne Archibald wrote: > 2008/5/7 Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> All, >> Yes, there is a problem with ma.power: masking negative data should be >> restricted to the case of an exponent between -1. and 1. only, don't you >> think ? >> > > No, there's a problem with any fractional expo