On 3/27/07, Zachary Pincus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So we are left with the current behavior:
(a) M[i,:] is a matrix.
(b) M[i] is a matrix.
(c) Iteration over M yields matrices.
I find it useful if M[i] indexes the matrix interpreted as a column-vector
(vec(M), or M(:) in
Matlab notation),
I would like to hear your opinion on developing an explicit sparse/dense 2D
matrix class with indexing similar to Matlab, and without significant
differences between sparse and dense matrices from the user's
perspective...
I know that it's not one of Numpy/Scipy's goals to clone Matlab, but I
th
