Re: [Numpy-discussion] question about long doubles on ppc64el

2017-01-16 Thread Jens Nielsen
According to https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/user/basics.types.html#extended-precision numpy long doubles are typically zero padded to 128 bits on 64 bit systems could that be the reason? On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 at 07:00 Thomas Caswell wrote: > Folks, > > Over at h5py we are trying to get a rel

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

2016-04-20 Thread Jens Nielsen
Thanks I can confirm that the new narrow unicode build wheels of Scipy works as expected for my project. @Oliver Grisel Thanks for finding the Travis issue it's probably worth considering switching the Travis build to 2.7.11 to avoid other similar issues. The old versions of numpy are very handy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

2016-04-17 Thread Jens Nielsen
I have tested the new cp27m wheels and they seem to work great. @Matthew I am using the: ``` sudo: required dist: trusty images mentioned here https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/ci-environment/. As far as I can see you are doing: sudo: false dist: trusty I had no idea such an image exist since it'

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

2016-04-14 Thread Jens Nielsen
I have tried testing the wheels in a project that runs tests on Travis's Trusty infrastructure which. The wheels work great for python 3.5 and saves us several minuts of runtime. However, I am having trouble using the wheels on python 2.7 on the same Trusty machines. It seems to be because the whe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] testing numpy with downstream testsuites (was: Re: Notes from the numpy dev meeting at scipy 2015)

2015-08-26 Thread Jens Nielsen
As a Matplotlib developer I try to test our code manually with all betas and rc of new numpy versions. (And already pushed fixed a few new deprecation warnings with 1.10beta1 which otherwise passes our test suite. I forgot to report this back since there were no issues to report ) However, we could

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Development workflow (not git tutorial)

2015-08-14 Thread Jens Nielsen
I think it's clear that develop/-e does not work well together with namespace packages. As noted on the relevant matplotlib issue https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/4907 I think the issue with namespace packages is essentially this well known one https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/3 wh

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.9.1 release candidate

2014-10-27 Thread Jens Nielsen
Thanks Julian, Just confirming that this (as expected) solves the issues that we have seen with gradient in Matplotlib with 1.9.0 best regards Jens On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We have finally finished the first release cand

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8.1rc1 on sourceforge.

2014-03-10 Thread Jens Nielsen
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > >> If we relax things too much, will we also get homebrew and macports and >> built-it-myself pythons, and will they work? >> >> Not likely. On 10.7 and 10.8 python.org and system python u

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Execution time difference between 2.7 and 3.2 using numpy

2013-03-20 Thread Jens Nielsen
The python3 version is compiled without any optimised library and is falling back on a slow version. Where did you get this installation from? Jens On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Colin J. Williams wrote: > On 20/03/2013 10:30 AM, Frédéric Bastien wrote: > > Hi, > > > > win32 do not mean it is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Execution time difference between 2.7 and 3.2 using numpy

2013-03-20 Thread Jens Nielsen
Hi, Could also be that they are linked to different libs such as atlas and standart Blas. What is the output of numpy.show_config() in the two different python versions. Jens On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Daπid wrote: > Without much detailed knowledge of the topic, I would expect both > ve