Re: [Numpy-discussion] Schedule for 1.5.1?

2010-10-08 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 10/ 8/10 03:43 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Dr. David > Kirkbywrote: > >> On 10/ 6/10 12:49 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that >>> would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series: >>> >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Schedule for 1.5.1?

2010-10-07 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 10/ 6/10 12:49 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Hi, > > Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that > would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series: > > Any Python versions: > > - #1605 (Cython vs. PEP-3118 issue: raising exceptions with active > cython buffers

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on 64 bit Solaris 10 sparc)

2010-07-30 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/15/10 04:06 AM, Chris LeBlanc wrote: > Hi, > > Firstly thanks to everyone that has helped bring NumPy to the point it > is today. Its an excellent bit of software. > > I've recently managed to get NumPy to compile on a 64 bit Solaris 10 > (sparc) machine. We've embedded 64 bit Python in som

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on 64 bit Solaris 10 sparc)

2010-07-30 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/17/10 02:53 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Chris LeBlanc wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Firstly thanks to everyone that has helped bring NumPy to the point it >> is today. Its an excellent bit of software. >> >> I've recently managed to get NumPy to compile on a 64 bit S

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Is numpy ignoring CFLAGS?

2010-06-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/28/10 02:54 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Dr. David Kirkby > wrote: >> On 06/28/10 11:28 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby >> >>>> Many other parts of Sage seem to in

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Is numpy ignoring CFLAGS?

2010-06-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/28/10 11:28 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby >> Many other parts of Sage seem to inherit the flags ok from Python, but not >> numpy. > > Are you saying that OPT is not taken into account ? It seems to work > for me, e.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Is numpy ignoring CFLAGS?

2010-06-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/28/10 09:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> On some 64-bit platforms, which include, but is not limited to: >> >>* Some version of OS X (I don't know what versions or processors) >>* Solaris on SPARC processors. &

[Numpy-discussion] Is numpy ignoring CFLAGS?

2010-06-27 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On some 64-bit platforms, which include, but is not limited to: * Some version of OS X (I don't know what versions or processors) * Solaris on SPARC processors. * Solaris on x86 processors. * OpenSolaris on SPARC processors. * OpenSolaris on x86 processors. * HP-UX on PA-RISC processor

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy not reconising PA-RISC CPU on HP-UX workstation.

2009-12-10 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:13 PM, David Kirkby > wrote: > > See here for a fuller errror message, > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7166 > > but basically I see: > > gcc: build/src.hp-ux-B.11.11-9000-785