Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

irtanen wrote: > >> Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:15:08 +0100, Didrik Pinte kirjoitti: >> >> The advantage of something like github pages is that it's big enough >> >> that it *does* have dedicated ops support. >> > >> > Agreed. One issue is that we ar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

On 15 March 2017 at 22:56, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Bryan Van de ven > wrote: > > NumPy is a NumFocus fiscally sponsored project, perhaps they can help > with the costs of different/better hosting. > > Enthought already provides hosting and operations support (th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] mail.scipy.org update

If all the SSL certification updates have been done properly, this message should go through. -- Didrik On 14 September 2016 at 13:00, Didrik Pinte wrote: > Hi everyone, > > While updating the scipy SSL certificates yesterday, it appeared that > filesystem of the servers is cor

[Numpy-discussion] test

checking if server works as expected after SSL cert update ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

[Numpy-discussion] mail.scipy.org update

Hi everyone, While updating the scipy SSL certificates yesterday, it appeared that filesystem of the servers is corrupted (more than likely a hardware failure). The problem is restricted to one volume and impacts only the web services. The mailing list/mailman service works as expected. We're wor

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Document server error.

On 21 February 2014 16:38, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Didrik Pinte wrote: > >> That specific issue is fixed. >> >> -- Didrik >> >> >> On 21 February 2014 15:26, Didrik Pinte wrote: >> >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Document server error.

That specific issue is fixed. -- Didrik On 21 February 2014 15:26, Didrik Pinte wrote: > > > > On 19 February 2014 07:42, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> From issue #1951 <https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/1951>: >> >> The following URL shows

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Document server error.

On 19 February 2014 07:42, Charles R Harris wrote: > From issue #1951 : > > The following URL shows an 500 internal server error: >> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.var.html >> > > Can someone with access to the server take a lo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Convert datetime64 to python datetime.datetime in numpy 1.6.1?

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Warren Weckesser wrote: > In numpy 1.6.1, what's the most straightforward way to convert a datetime64 > to a python datetime.datetime?  E.g. I have > > In [1]: d = datetime64("2011-12-03 12:34:56.75") > > In [2]: d > Out[2]: 2011-12-03 12:34:56.75 > > I want the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Viewer for 2D Numpy arrays (GUI)

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Mayank P Jain wrote: > I thought about these options but what I need is excel like interface that > displays the values for each cell and one can modify and save the files. > > This would be convenient way of saving large files in less space and at the > same time,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Can this be done more efficiently using numpy?

On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 23:13 -0700, Vishal Rana wrote: > Hi, > > > A calculation which goes like this... > > > n = 5 > a = np.arange(1000) > b = np.arange(n - 1, 1000) > > > l = [] > for i in range(b.size): > # Absolute difference of n a elements and nth b element > x = np.abs(a[i:i +

Re: [Numpy-discussion] effectively computing variograms with numpy

On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 23:09 +0200, Hanno Klemm wrote: > I will try and dig a bit more in the literature, maybe I find something. > > Hanno I don't know if it can help. We started a project to convert BMELib (a matlab library) into Python. It's still bound with Numeric but it should be pretty stra