Hi,
Thanks for the tip. For small matrices this method seems to be faster,
however, for matrices of
the size I'm using it actually seems to be slower than simply looping...
Regards,
David
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at
Hi,
I have a list of matrices W_k I'd like to multiply with a list of vectors
v_k,
or another way of looking at it, writing all W_k into a 3d array and all
v_k into a 2d matrix/array, I'd like to compute matrix R as
R_ik = sum_j W_ijk h_jk.
Is there a fast way of doing that in numpy?
Regards,
sn't enough.
Cheers
David
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:13 PM, David Reichert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After some work I got an optimized numpy compiled on a machine where I
> don't
> have root access, but I had to use numpy 1.4.0 to make it work. Now I have
> the problem that I
Hi,
After some work I got an optimized numpy compiled on a machine where I don't
have root access, but I had to use numpy 1.4.0 to make it work. Now I have
the problem that I cannot seem to unpickle data I had created using numpy
1.3,
getting an ImportError about defmatrix not being found.
I unde
these things. Maybe other people can confirm the problem
one way or another.
Thanks,
David
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:32 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:24 PM, David Reichert
> wrote:
> > Hm, upgrading scipy from 0.7.0 to 0.7.1 didn't do the trick for me (still
> > runni
Hm, upgrading scipy from 0.7.0 to 0.7.1 didn't do the trick for me (still
running numpy 1.3.0).
I'm not sure if I feel confident enough to use developer versions, but I'll
look into it.
Cheers
David
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 20
Hi,
I just reported a memory leak with matrices, and I might have found
another (unrelated) one in the convolve2d function:
import scipy.signal
from numpy import ones
while True:
scipy.signal.convolve2d(ones((1,1)), ones((1,1)))
Is there an alternative implementation of a 2d convolution? O
Thanks for the reply.
Yes never mind the second issue, I had myself confused there.
Any comments on the memory leak?
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:55 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:31 PM, David Paul Reichert
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got two issues:
> >
> > First, the following seems t