Re: [Numpy-discussion] Is there any official position on PEP484/mypy?

2016-07-29 Thread Daniel Moisset
ing the expected > shapes in this annotation format. > > As for matplotlib, we would need to express much more complicated > annotations, because our API is so flexible. It would be useful to keep an > eye out to those needs as well. > > Cheers! > Ben Root > > > On F

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Is there any official position on PEP484/mypy?

2016-07-29 Thread Daniel Moisset
numpy devs! Best, D. [1] http://www.machinalis.com/blog/writing-type-stubs-for-numpy/ [2] https://github.com/machinalis/mypy-data/issues On 29 Jul 2016 08:31, "Sebastian Berg" wrote: > On Mi, 2016-07-27 at 20:07 +0100, Daniel Moisset wrote: > > > > Hi, > > >

[Numpy-discussion] Is there any official position on PEP484/mypy?

2016-07-27 Thread Daniel Moisset
Hi, I work at Machinalis were we use a lot of numpy (and the pydata stack in general). Recently we've also been getting involved with mypy, which is a tool to type check (not on runtime, think of it as a linter) annotated python code (the way of annotating python types has been recently standarize