On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Asher Langton wrote:
> This is a followup to my post from January
> (http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-January/059801.html)
> and the panel discussion at PyData this weekend. As a few people have
> suggested, a better approach
This is a followup to my post from January
(http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-January/059801.html)
and the panel discussion at PyData this weekend. As a few people have
suggested, a better approach than the MPI-broadcasted lookups is to
cache the locations of all the modules fou
Hi all,
(I originally posted this to the BayPIGgies list, where Fernando Perez
suggested I send it to the NumPy list as well. My apologies if you're
receiving this email twice.)
I work on a Python/C++ scientific code that runs as a number of
independent Python processes communicating via MPI. Unf
