Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.11.0b3 released.

2016-02-17 Thread Andreas Mueller
On 02/12/2016 04:19 PM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/doc/release/1.11.0-notes.rst Thanks. That doesn't cover the backward incompatible change to assert_almost_equal and assert_array_almost_equal, right? ___ Num

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.11.0b3 released.

2016-02-12 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hi. Where can I find the changelog? It would be good for us to know which changes are done one purpos without hunting through the issue tracker. Thanks, Andy On 02/09/2016 09:09 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: Hi All, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.11.0b3. This beta contains add

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.0b2 released

2016-02-10 Thread Andreas Mueller
On 02/01/2016 04:25 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: It would be nice but its not realistic, I doubt most upstreams that are not themselves major downstreams are even subscribed to this list. I'm pretty sure that some core devs from all major scipy stack packages are subscribed to this l

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.0b2 released

2016-02-10 Thread Andreas Mueller
test()'" >> This might not be viable right now, but will be made more viable if pypi starts allowing official Linux wheels, which looks likely to happen before 1.12... (see PEP 513) >> >> On Jan 29, 2016 9:46 AM, "Andreas Mueller" <mailto:t3k...@gmail.co

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.0b2 released

2016-01-29 Thread Andreas Mueller
Is this the point when scikit-learn should build against it? Or do we wait for an RC? Also, we need a scipy build against it. Who does that? Our continuous integration doesn't usually build scipy or numpy, so it will be a bit tricky to add to our config. Would you run our master tests? [did we e

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: scikit-learn 0.13 released!

2013-01-21 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hi all. I am very happy to announce the release of scikit-learn 0.13. New features in this release include feature hashing for text processing, passive-agressive classifiers, faster random forests and many more. There have also been countless improvements in stability, consistency and usability.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] bug in numpy.where?

2012-07-27 Thread Andreas Mueller
On 07/27/2012 09:10 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Andreas Mueller mailto:amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de>> wrote: Hi Everybody. The bug is that no error is raised, right? The docs say where(condition, [x, y]) x, y : array_like, op

Re: [Numpy-discussion] bug in numpy.where?

2012-07-27 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hi Everybody. The bug is that no error is raised, right? The docs say where(condition, [x, y]) x, y : array_like, optional Values from which to choose. `x` and `y` need to have the same shape as `condition` In the example you gave, x was a scalar. Cheers, Andy