On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:11 PM, srean wrote:
> Thanks Francesc, Robert for giving me a broader picture of where this fits
> in. I believe numexpr does not handle slicing, so that might be another
> thing to look at.
>
Dereferencing would be relatively simple to add into numexpr, as it would
jus
Thanks Francesc, Robert for giving me a broader picture of where this fits
in. I believe numexpr does not handle slicing, so that might be another
thing to look at.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Robert McLeod wrote:
>
> As Francesc said, Numexpr is going to get most of its power through
> gr
All,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Francesc Alted wrote:
> 2016-10-05 8:45 GMT+02:00 srean :
>
>> Good discussion, but was surprised by the absence of numexpr in the
>> discussion., given how relevant it (numexpr) is to the topic.
>>
>> Is the goal to fold in the numexpr functionality (and be
