Re: [Numpy-discussion] gmane

2016-09-09 Thread Nathan Goldbaum
Hi Chuck, Since that blog post, Gmane is under new management and will continue to be available: http://home.gmane.org Nathan On Friday, September 9, 2016, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Looks like gmane is going down > . Does

[Numpy-discussion] gmane

2016-09-09 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Looks like gmane is going down . Does anyone know of an alternative for searching and referencing the NumPy mail archives? Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.2

2016-09-09 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > what is the status for this? i checked on GH and > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/milestone/43 seems to report no issue > pending. the reason i'm asking is that i still have to package 1.11.1 > for debian, but i dont want to do all the work and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.2

2016-09-09 Thread Sandro Tosi
what is the status for this? i checked on GH and https://github.com/numpy/numpy/milestone/43 seems to report no issue pending. the reason i'm asking is that i still have to package 1.11.1 for debian, but i dont want to do all the work and then the next day you release a new version (oh, dear Murphy