Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: numpy.random.random_seed

2016-05-23 Thread Robert Kern
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Robert Kern wrote: >> >> Well, I mean, engineers want lots of things. I suspect that most engineers *really* just want to call `numpy.random.seed(8675309)` at the start and never explicitly pass around separ

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: numpy.random.random_seed

2016-05-23 Thread Chris Barker
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Robert Kern wrote: > > Well, I mean, engineers want lots of things. I suspect that most engineers > *really* just want to call `numpy.random.seed(8675309)` at the start and > never explicitly pass around separate streams. There's an upside to that in > terms of cod

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A numpy based Entity-Component-System

2016-05-23 Thread Benjamin Root
As a bit of a real-life example where things can go wrong with naming. The "pylab" name was accidentally hijacked a couple years ago on pypi, and caused several bug reports to be filed against matplotlib for failing scripts. Some people thought that one should do "pip install pylab" to do "from py