Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy 1.10.1 reduce operation on recarrays

2015-10-16 Thread Allan Haldane
On 10/16/2015 09:17 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Allan Haldane mailto:allanhald...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/16/2015 05:31 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Charles R Harri

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy 1.10.1 reduce operation on recarrays

2015-10-16 Thread josef.pktd
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Allan Haldane wrote: > On 10/16/2015 05:31 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Charles R Harris > > mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Charles R Harris > > ma

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy 1.10.1 reduce operation on recarrays

2015-10-16 Thread Allan Haldane
On 10/16/2015 05:31 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Charles R Harris > mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Charles R Harris > mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy 1.10.1 reduce operation on recarrays

2015-10-16 Thread josef.pktd
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:58 AM, wrote: >> >>> was there a change with reduce operations with recarrays in 1.10 or >>> 1.10.1? >>> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy 1.10.1 reduce operation on recarrays

2015-10-16 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:58 AM, wrote: > >> was there a change with reduce operations with recarrays in 1.10 or >> 1.10.1? >> >> Travis shows a new test failure in the statsmodels testsuite with 1.10.1:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy 1.10.1 reduce operation on recarrays

2015-10-16 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:58 AM, wrote: > was there a change with reduce operations with recarrays in 1.10 or 1.10.1? > > Travis shows a new test failure in the statsmodels testsuite with 1.10.1: > > ERROR: test suite for 'statsmodels.base.tests.test_data.TestRecarrays'> > > File > "/home/tra

[Numpy-discussion] numpy 1.10.1 reduce operation on recarrays

2015-10-16 Thread josef.pktd
was there a change with reduce operations with recarrays in 1.10 or 1.10.1? Travis shows a new test failure in the statsmodels testsuite with 1.10.1: ERROR: test suite for File "/home/travis/miniconda/envs/statsmodels-test/lib/python2.7/site-packages/statsmodels-0.8.0-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bug

2015-10-16 Thread josef.pktd
Sorry, wrong shortcut key, question will arrive later. Josef On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:40 PM, wrote: > > > ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

[Numpy-discussion] Bug

2015-10-16 Thread josef.pktd
___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Making datetime64 timezone naive

2015-10-16 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > And because we probably want fast absolute delta computation, when we add > timezones, we'll probably want to store the datetime in UTC, and apply the > timezone on I/O. > > Alexander: Am I right that we don't need the "fold" bit in this case