On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for replying, that is helpful.
>>>
>>> I'm going to write carefully, because I suspect we've only got t
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for replying, that is helpful.
>>
>> I'm going to write carefully, because I suspect we've only got this
>> one shot at getting it right.
>
> Not sure why? "Change the
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for replying, that is helpful.
>
> I'm going to write carefully, because I suspect we've only got this
> one shot at getting it right.
Not sure why? "Change the governance document" is explicitly listed as
one of the steering c
Hi,
Thanks for replying, that is helpful.
I'm going to write carefully, because I suspect we've only got this
one shot at getting it right.
I first wanted to come back to an earlier email of yours:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> At least personally, I have to admit t
Hi all, first attempt at this:
small doco patch to
address https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/6247
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/compare/master...pizzathief:issue6247?diff=unified&expand=1&name=issue6247
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discuss
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>>> 1) I very much agree that governance can make or break a project. However,
>>> the actual governance approach often end
