Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> 1) I very much agree that governance can make or break a project. However,
> the actual governance approach often ends up making less difference than the
> people involved.
>
> 2) While the FreeBSD and XFree examples do point to some real
>From my perspective, a major advantage to dtypes is composability. For
example, it's hard to write a library like dask.array (out of core arrays)
that can suppose holding any conceivable ndarray subclass (like MaskedArray
or quantity), but handling arbitrary dtypes is quite straightforward -- and
Hi Nathaniel,
Thanks for the detailed reply; it helped a lot to understand how one could,
indeed, have dtypes contain units. And if one had not just on-the-fly
conversion from int to float as part of an internal loop, but also
on-the-fly multiplication, then it would even be remarkably fast. Will
On 08/31/2015 12:09 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote:
> There are three ways of fixing this that I see:
>
> 1. Arbitrarily choose a value to set the return to. This is equivalent
> to choosing a default return for `cmp` for comparisons. This
> preserves behavior, but feels wrong.
> 2. S
