Hi,
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 04:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
>> resources to collaborating with the OpenBLAS team.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is relatively easy to add tests using Py
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Tom Krauss
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> After some discussion with Bill Spotz I decided to try to submit my new
> typemap to numpy.i that allows in-place arrays of an arbitrary number of
> dimensions to be passed in as a "flat" array with a single "size".
>
> To that en
Matthew Brett wrote:
> I am getting the impression that OpenBLAS is looking like the most
> likely medium term solution for open-source stack builds of numpy and
> scipy on Linux and Windows at least.
I think you right.
OpenBLAS might even be a long-term solution. We should also consider that
On 05/26/2015 04:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
> resources to collaborating with the OpenBLAS team.
>
>
>
> It is relatively easy to add tests using Python / numpy. We like
> tests. Why don't we propose a collaborati
Hi folks,
After some discussion with Bill Spotz I decided to try to submit my new
typemap to numpy.i that allows in-place arrays of an arbitrary number of
dimensions to be passed in as a "flat" array with a single "size".
To that end I created my first pull request
https://github.com/numpy/nump
Hi,
This morning I was wondering whether we ought to plan to devote some
resources to collaborating with the OpenBLAS team.
Summary: we should explore ways of setting up numpy as a test engine
for OpenBLAS development.
Detail:
I am getting the impression that OpenBLAS is looking like the most
