Re: [Numpy-discussion] binary wheels for numpy?

On 18/05/15 21:57, Chris Barker wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: > > I believe OpenBLAS does run-time selection too. > > > very cool! then an excellent option if we can get it to work (make that > you can get it to work, I'm not d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] binary wheels for numpy?

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > I believe OpenBLAS does run-time selection too. very cool! then an excellent option if we can get it to work (make that you can get it to work, I'm not doing squat in this effort other than nudging...) I think we discussed before having a

[Numpy-discussion] MaskedArray compatibility decorators

Hello, I created 2 decorators for improve compatibility of "numpy.ma.MaskedArray" with functions that don't support them. This simply convert MaskedArray to classical ndarray with masked value converted to NaN, use the function, and reconvert to MaskedArray. @MaArrayToNaNKeepMask : Re-use the so

Re: [Numpy-discussion] binary wheels for numpy?

- Original Message - > From: Matthew Brett > To: Discussion of Numerical Python > Cc: > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 6:32 AM > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] binary wheels for numpy? > > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Chri

Re: [Numpy-discussion] binary wheels for numpy?

On 18/05/15 06:09, Chris Barker wrote: > IIUC, The Intel libs have the great advantage of run-time selection of > hardware specific code -- yes? So they would both work and give high > performance on most machines (all?). OpenBLAS can also be built for dynamic architecture with hardware auto-det