Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread Derek Homeier
On 9 Apr 2015, at 9:41 pm, Andrew Collette wrote: > >> Congrats! Also btw, you might want to switch to a new subject line format >> for these emails -- the mention of Python 2.5 getting hdf5 support made me >> do a serious double take before I figured out what was going on, and 2.6 and >> 2.7 wil

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread Andrew Collette
> Congrats! Also btw, you might want to switch to a new subject line format > for these emails -- the mention of Python 2.5 getting hdf5 support made me > do a serious double take before I figured out what was going on, and 2.6 and > 2.7 will be even worse :-) Ha! Didn't even think of that. For

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Apr 9, 2015 2:41 PM, "Nathaniel Smith" wrote: > > (Off-list) Doh, we do reply-to munging, don't we. Oh well. -n ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread josef.pktd
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > (Off-list) > > Congrats! Also btw, you might want to switch to a new subject line format > for these emails -- the mention of Python 2.5 getting hdf5 support made me > do a serious double take before I figured out what was going on, and 2.6

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread Nathaniel Smith
(Off-list) Congrats! Also btw, you might want to switch to a new subject line format for these emails -- the mention of Python 2.5 getting hdf5 support made me do a serious double take before I figured out what was going on, and 2.6 and 2.7 will be even worse :-) On Apr 9, 2015 2:07 PM, "Andrew Co

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: HDF5 for Python 2.5.0

2015-04-09 Thread Andrew Collette
Announcing HDF5 for Python (h5py) 2.5.0 The h5py team is happy to announce the availability of h5py 2.5.0. This release introduces experimental support for the highly-anticipated "Single Writer Multiple Reader" (SWMR) feature in the upcoming HDF5 1.10 rele

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: "fancy" vs. orthogonal)

2015-04-09 Thread josef.pktd
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote: > > Alan wrote: >>> 3. I admit, my students are NOT using non-boolen fancy indexing on >>> >multidimensional arrays. (As far as I know.) Are yours? The only confusing case is mixing slices and integer array indexing for ndim > 2. The rest loo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: "fancy" vs. orthogonal)

2015-04-09 Thread Alan G Isaac
> Alan wrote: >> 3. I admit, my students are NOT using non-boolen fancy indexing on >> >multidimensional arrays. (As far as I know.) Are yours? On 4/9/2015 2:22 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Well, okay, this would explain it, since integer fancy indexing is > exactly the confusing case:-) On th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: "fancy" vs. orthogonal)

2015-04-09 Thread Alan G Isaac
On 4/9/2015 1:57 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Do you think there's anything we could be > doing to reduce this kind of adrenaline reaction while still allowing > for relaxed discussion about out-there ideas? numpy3...@scipy.org :-) ___ NumPy-Discussion

[Numpy-discussion] what files to include with compiled fortran extension on Mac

2015-04-09 Thread Mark Bakker
Hello list, I want to send somebody my compiled fortran extension on a Mac (compiled with f2py and gfortran). Problem is that it doesn't work on other Macs unless they also instal xcode (2 GB, yikes!) and gfortran. So apparently there are some additional files missing when I just send the compile

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Non-meta indexing improvements discussion

2015-04-09 Thread Robert Kern
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > > On Do, 2015-04-09 at 08:50 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote: > > 3. I do not know if it possible or useful, but I could imagine a module > > wide switch (similar to __future__ imports) to change the default > > indexing behaviour. > > OK, my su

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Non-meta indexing improvements discussion

2015-04-09 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Do, 2015-04-09 at 08:50 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote: > Hi all, > > Let me take a shot at summing up some suggestions to make the indexing > less surprising, and maybe we can gather some more in a more > concentrated way now. > Did not want to comment on the first mail > 1. Implement somethin

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On responding to dubious ideas (was: Re: Advanced indexing: "fancy" vs. orthogonal)

2015-04-09 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Do, 2015-04-09 at 02:22 -0400, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote: > > 1. I use numpy in teaching. > > I have never heard a complaint about its indexing behavior. > > Have you heard such complaints? > > Some observations: > > 1) There's an unrelated th