Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: "fancy" vs. orthogonal

2015-04-05 Thread Sebastian Berg
On So, 2015-04-05 at 14:13 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On So, 2015-04-05 at 00:45 -0700, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río > > > > > > > A PR it is, #5749 to be precise. I think it has all the bells and > > whistles: integers, boolean

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Sebastian Berg
On So, 2015-04-05 at 07:08 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Sebastian Berg > wrote: > On Fr, 2015-04-03 at 21:00 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > > > Just to raise the question if these two options shou

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Fr, 2015-04-03 at 21:00 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > > > Just to raise the question if these two options should be removed at > > some point? The current default value for both is 0, so we have > > separate compilati

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: "fancy" vs. orthogonal

2015-04-05 Thread Sebastian Berg
On So, 2015-04-05 at 00:45 -0700, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río > > > A PR it is, #5749 to be precise. I think it has all the bells and > whistles: integers, boolean and integer 1-D arrays, slices, ellipsis, > and even newaxis, both fo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Apr 5, 2015 3:09 AM, "David Cournapeau" wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >> IIRC there allegedly exist platforms where separate compilation doesn't work right? I'm happy to get rid of it if no one speaks up to defend such platforms, though, we can always add

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: "fancy" vs. orthogonal

2015-04-05 Thread Robert Kern
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2015 4:12 AM, "Todd" wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 4, 2015 10:54 AM, "Nathaniel Smith" wrote: > > > > > > Core python broke backcompat on a regular basis throughout the python > > > 2 series, and almost certainly will again -- the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Fr, 2015-04-03 at 21:00 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > > Just to raise the question if these two options should be removed at > some point? The current default value for both is 0, so we have > separate compilation and relaxed strides checking by default. > I still have some sm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > IIRC there allegedly exist platforms where separate compilation doesn't > work right? I'm happy to get rid of it if no one speaks up to defend such > platforms, though, we can always add it back later. One case was for > statically linking

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: "fancy" vs. orthogonal

2015-04-05 Thread Jaime Fernández del Río
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río < jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have an all-Pyhton implementation of an OrthogonalIndexer class, loosely > based on Stephan's code plus some axis remapping, that provides all the > needed functionality for getting and setting with orthogo