Re: [Numpy-discussion] Asking proposal review/feedback for GSOC 15

On 03/26/2015 12:58 PM, Oğuzhan Ünlü wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for a bit late reply. I will express my thoughts for Ralf's > suggestions, respectively. > > > Regarding your schedule: > - I would remove the parts related to benchmarks. There's no nice > benchmark > infrastructure in

[Numpy-discussion] Proposal feedback

Hello, I'm Marcos from Brazil! I've recently finalized a sketch of my proposal (on porting core functions of numpy from c to cython) and I would like some feedback from you. It can be seen on the following link: https://github.com/marcospc6/GSoC-Proposal/blob/master/gsocproposal.md Couldn't get

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Asking proposal review/feedback for GSOC 15

Hi, Sorry for a bit late reply. I will express my thoughts for Ralf's suggestions, respectively. > Regarding your schedule: > - I would remove the parts related to benchmarks. There's no nice benchmark > infrastructure in numpy itself at the moment (that's a separate GSoC idea), > so the two tim

[Numpy-discussion] flags attribute of ndarrays`

Hi, I have just submitted a longish issue on the github repo, #5721 . After going in quite some detail over the flags attribute of ndarray's I have found several inconsistencies with the C API, and would like to make some changes. The details are in gh,