I read the "Methods" section of the ufuncs doc page (
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/ufuncs.html#methods) again and I
think this could be made clearer simply by replacing the first sentence from
"All ufuncs have four methods."
to
"All ufuncs have five methods that operate on array-lik
Hi All,
There is an old file, numpy/core/src/multiarray/testcalcs.py, that looks
like a forgotten leftover from the original 2009 datetime work. Is there
any reason that this file should not be removed?
Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Disc
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Antony Lee wrote:
>> I see. I went back to the documentation of ufunc.reduce and this is not
>> explicitly mentioned although a posteriori it makes sense; perhaps this can
>> be made clearer there?
>
> Please
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Antony Lee wrote:
> I see. I went back to the documentation of ufunc.reduce and this is not
> explicitly mentioned although a posteriori it makes sense; perhaps this can
> be made clearer there?
Please recommend the documentation you would like to see.
--
Rober
I see. I went back to the documentation of ufunc.reduce and this is not
explicitly mentioned although a posteriori it makes sense; perhaps this can
be made clearer there?
Antony
2014-09-12 2:22 GMT-07:00 Robert Kern :
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Antony Lee
> wrote:
> > I am not using as
Hi,
I tried to following the calling logic behind the help function and I've
arrived at the 3-4th level underground with the pydoc.render_doc
function. Here some logic is inspecting the `thing` that getting
documented. The fact that the docstring of the vectorize function is not
read may relat
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Antony Lee wrote:
> I am not using asarray here. Sorry, but I don't see how this is relevant --
> my comparison with np.add.reduce is simply that when a list of float arrays
> is passed to np.add.reduce, broadcasting happens as usual, but not when a
> list of boo
I am not using asarray here. Sorry, but I don't see how this is relevant
-- my comparison with np.add.reduce is simply that when a list of float
arrays is passed to np.add.reduce, broadcasting happens as usual, but not
when a list of bool arrays is passed to np.logical_and.reduce.
2014-09-12 0:48
On Do, 2014-09-11 at 22:54 -0700, Antony Lee wrote:
> Hi,
> I thought that ufunc.reduce performs broadcasting, but it seems a bit
> confused by boolean arrays:
>
>
> In [1]: add.reduce([array([1, 2]), array([1])])
> Out[1]: array([2, 3])
> In [2]: logical_and.reduce([array([True, False], dtype=bo
10 matches
Mail list logo