On 05.08.2014 00:27, Matthew Brett wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Julian Taylor
>> wrote:
>>> On 05.08.2014 00:09, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> hi,
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Julian Taylor
> wrote:
>> On 05.08.2014 00:09, Matthew Brett wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Julian Taylor
>>> wrote:
hi,
as numpy 1.9 is going to be a relative hard upgrade
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> On 05.08.2014 00:09, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Julian Taylor
>> wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> as numpy 1.9 is going to be a relative hard upgrade as indexing changes
>>> expose a couple bugs in third party packag
On 05.08.2014 00:09, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Julian Taylor
> wrote:
>> hi,
>> as numpy 1.9 is going to be a relative hard upgrade as indexing changes
>> expose a couple bugs in third party packages and the large amount of
>> small little incompatibilities I
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> hi,
> as numpy 1.9 is going to be a relative hard upgrade as indexing changes
> expose a couple bugs in third party packages and the large amount of
> small little incompatibilities I will create a numpy 1.8.2 release
> tomorrow with a co
hi,
as numpy 1.9 is going to be a relative hard upgrade as indexing changes
expose a couple bugs in third party packages and the large amount of
small little incompatibilities I will create a numpy 1.8.2 release
tomorrow with a couple of important or hard to work around bugfixes.
The most importan
Hi everyone,
I've added the ability to handle weighted data in a covariance calculation,
in a similar manner to that already implemented for the calculation of a
weighted average.
https://github.com/tpoole/numpy/compare/weighted_cov
Could an experienced someone please look over my changes before
