Great, thanks! And we can certainly try to either move into planning at the
end, or plan for such afterwards.
Best
f
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, J
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Fernando Perez
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've just created a page on the numpy wiki:
>>
>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numpy-BoF-at-Scipy-2014
>>
>> I'd appreciate it if people could put
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Fernando Perez
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just created a page on the numpy wiki:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numpy-BoF-at-Scipy-2014
>
> I'd appreciate it if people could put down on that page the title of
> topics, plus a brief summary (with links to
Hi folks,
I've just created a page on the numpy wiki:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numpy-BoF-at-Scipy-2014
I'd appreciate it if people could put down on that page the title of
topics, plus a brief summary (with links to this or other relevant
threads), they'd like to see discussed.
BoFs
On Jun 27, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
> Hi Kyle,
>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:40 I'd like to propose adopting something like the
>> Blaze standard for datetime,
+1 for some focused discussion of datetime. This has been lingering
far too long.
-Chris
__
