On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Believe me, I'm all for incremental changes if it is actually possible and
> doesn't actually cost more. It's also why I've been silent until now about
> anything we are doing being a candidate for a NumPy 2.0. I understand the
> challeng
Believe me, I'm all for incremental changes if it is actually possible and
doesn't actually cost more. It's also why I've been silent until now about
anything we are doing being a candidate for a NumPy 2.0. I understand the
challenges of getting people to change. But, features and solid
improvem
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Even relatively simple changes can have significant impact at this point.
> Nathaniel has laid out a fantastic list of great features. These are the
> kind of features I have been eager to see as well. This is why I have been
> working to
On 02.06.2014 14:26, David Cournapeau wrote:
> FFTW is not used anymore in neither numpy or scipy (has not been for
> several years). If you want to use fftw with numpy, there are 3rd party
> extensions to do it, like pyfftw
If you feel pyfftw bothers you with too many FFTW details, you may try
s
I won't be able to make it at scipy this year sadly.
I concur with Nathaniel that we can do a lot of things without a full
rewrite -- it is all too easy to see what is gained with a rewrite and lose
sight of what is lost. I have yet to see a really strong argument for a
full rewrite. It may be eas
Hi!
Maybe there's someone who can answer the following question at stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/24019099/1606022?sem=2
It is about extending meshgrid functionality to 2D input arrays...
Regards,
--
Marek
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
On Mi, 2014-06-04 at 02:26 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> As one of the co-chairs in charge of organizing the birds-of-a-feather
> >> sesssions at
Dear all,
Thank you for this information. I will return to this issue later and
probably make patch (as temporary solution) for this. Because I never tried
before, so it may take me some time. For the other overall masked array
constructing issues, it might be left further for more discussion.
B
