Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Matthew Brett
Aha, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: >> A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to >> deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to the toolchain could >> be extended d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Sturla Molden
Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Yes, Windows is the only platform on which Fortran was problematic. OSX > is somewhat saner in this respect. Oh yes, it seems there are official "unofficial gfortran binaries" available for OSX: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries#MacOS Cool :) Sturla __

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread josef . pktd
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to > deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to the toolchain > could be extended during import of the package. But I have no idea, whats > the best strateg

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to > deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to the toolchain could > be extended during import of the package. But I have no idea, whats the best > str

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Carl Kleffner
A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to the toolchain could be extended during import of the package. But I have no idea, whats the best strategy to additionaly install ATLAS or other third party libraries.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > Hi, > > I will definitly don't have not time until thursday this week working out > the github workflow for a numpy pull request. So feel free to do it for me. OK - I will have a go at this tomorrow. > BTW: There is a missing feature i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Carl Kleffner
Hi, I will definitly don't have not time until thursday this week working out the github workflow for a numpy pull request. So feel free to do it for me. BTW: There is a missing feature in the mingw-w64 toolchain. By now it features linking to msvcrt90 runtime only. I have do extend the specs fil

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Hi, > > 25.04.2014 00:56, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:> Thanks to Cark Kleffner's > toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley >> (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy >> wheels for testing. > > Where can I get yo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Hi, 25.04.2014 00:56, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:> Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley > (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy > wheels for testing. Where can I get your numpy.patch scipy.patch and what's in them? Cheers,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Slightly off-topic - accuracy of C exp function?

2014-04-27 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Hi, 27.04.2014 01:37, Matthew Brett kirjoitti: [clip] > Take-home : exp implementation for mingw-w64 is exactly (floating > point) correct 82% of the time, and one unit-at-the-last-place off for > the rest [1]. OSX is off by 1 ULP only 0.2% of the time. > > Is mingw-w64 accurate enough? Do we h

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi Carl, On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > Hi, > > basically the toolchain was created with a local fork of the "mingw-builds" > build process along with some addons and patches. It is NOT a mingw-w64 > fork. BTW: there are numerous mingw-w64 based toolchains out there, mos