Re: [Numpy-discussion] Slightly off-topic - accuracy of C exp function?

2014-04-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:31 PM, wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:05 PM, wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Matthew Brett >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Na

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Slightly off-topic - accuracy of C exp function?

2014-04-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:05 PM, wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Matthe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Slightly off-topic - accuracy of C exp function?

2014-04-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'm exploring Mingw

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposed new function for joining arrays: np.interleave

2014-04-26 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Björn Dahlgren wrote: > I think the code needed for the general n dimensional case with m number > of arrays > is non-trivial enough for it to be useful to provide such a function in > numpy > As of version 1.8.1, I count 571 public names in numpy namespace: >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Slightly off-topic - accuracy of C exp function?

2014-04-26 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm exploring Mingw-w64 for numpy building, and I've found it gives a >>> slightly different

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread Carl Kleffner
Hi, basically the toolchain was created with a local fork of the "mingw-builds" build process along with some addons and patches. It is NOT a mingw-w64 fork. BTW: there are numerous mingw-w64 based toolchains out there, most of them build without any information about the build process and patches

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.x branch

2014-04-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Mi, 2014-04-23 at 10:11 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Sebastian Berg > > wrote: > > > On Di, 2014-04-22 at 15:35 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > >> Hi All, > > >> > > >> > > >> I'd like to bra

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.x branch

2014-04-26 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Mi, 2014-04-23 at 10:11 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Sebastian Berg > wrote: > > On Di, 2014-04-22 at 15:35 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> > >> I'd like to branch 1.9.x at the end of the month. There are a couple > >> of reasons fo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread Pauli Virtanen
25.04.2014 08:57, Sturla Molden kirjoitti: [clip] > On the positive side: Does this mean we finally can use gfortran on > Windows? And if so, can we use Fortran versions beyond Fortran 77 in SciPy > now? Or is Mac OS X a blocker? Yes, Windows is the only platform on which Fortran was problematic.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread Sturla Molden
Matthew Brett wrote: > Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley > (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy > wheels for testing. Thanks for your great effort to solve this mess. By Murphy's law, I do not have access to a Windows computer on wh

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:20 AM, wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:10 AM, wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, wrote: >>> >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:10 AM, wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Har

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles