Re: [Numpy-discussion] Wiki page for building numerical stuff on Windows

Hi, On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Sturla Molden wrote: > Matthew Brett wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been working on a general wiki page on building numerical stuff on >> Windows: >> >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numerical-software-on-Windows >> >> I'm hoping to let Microsoft know what p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Wiki page for building numerical stuff on Windows

Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working on a general wiki page on building numerical stuff on > Windows: > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numerical-software-on-Windows > > I'm hoping to let Microsoft know what problems we're having, and > seeing whether we numericists can share

[Numpy-discussion] Wiki page for building numerical stuff on Windows

Hi, I've been working on a general wiki page on building numerical stuff on Windows: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numerical-software-on-Windows I'm hoping to let Microsoft know what problems we're having, and seeing whether we numericists can share some work - us and R and Julia and Octav

[Numpy-discussion] Fwd: [Python-Dev] PEP 465: A dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication

Hey all, Given the sometimes rocky history of collaboration between numerical Python and core Python, I thought it might be helpful to flag this posting for broader distribution -- it gives one perspective on how the core devs see things. (And is certainly consistent with my experience around PEP

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 465 has been accepted / volunteers needed

Hello, I really think that add a new operator @ is not a good thing. Sorry I just want to make a joke... ;-) Christophe BAL 2014-04-10 15:11 GMT+02:00 : > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Francesc Alted wrote: > > On 4/9/14, 10:46 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:14 AM,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 465 has been accepted / volunteers needed

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Francesc Alted wrote: > On 4/9/14, 10:46 PM, Chris Barker wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith > > wrote: >> >> Thank you! Though I suspect that the most important part of my >> contribution may have just been my

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 465 has been accepted / volunteers needed

On 4/9/14, 10:46 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith > wrote: > > Thank you! Though I suspect that the most important part of my > contribution may have just been my high tolerance for writing emails > ;-). > > > no -- it's