On Apr 4, 2014 8:54 PM, "Charles R Harris"
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:48 PM, wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > Currently there are several placements of the '.. versionadded::'
directive
>> > and I'd like to settle
>> >
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:48 PM, wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Carl Kleffner wrote:
>
> I'ts time for me to come back to the discussion after a longer break.
>
> some personal history: I was looking for a 64bit mingw more than a year ago
> (unrelated to python) for Fortran development and tried out quite some mingw
> toolc
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:48 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > Currently there are several
I'ts time for me to come back to the discussion after a longer break.
some personal history: I was looking for a 64bit mingw more than a year ago
(unrelated to python) for Fortran development and tried out quite some
mingw toolchain variants based on the mingw-w64 project. In a nutshell: the
most
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:48 PM, wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > Currently there are several placements of the '.. versionadded::'
>> > directive
>> > and I'd like
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:48 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Currently there are several placements of the '.. versionadded::'
> directive
> > and I'd like to settle
> > on a proper style for consistency. There are two occasions on which
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Currently there are several placements of the '.. versionadded::' directive
> and I'd like to settle
> on a proper style for consistency. There are two occasions on which it is
> used, first, when a new function or class is adde
Hi All,
Currently there are several placements of the '.. versionadded::' directive
and I'd like to settle
on a proper style for consistency. There are two occasions on which it is
used, first, when a new function or class is added and second, when a new
keyword is added to an existing function or
I'ts time for me to come back to the discussion after a longer break.
some personal history: I was looking for a 64bit mingw more than a year ago
(unrelated to python) for Fortran development and tried out quite some
mingw toolchain variants based on the mingw-w64 project. In a nutshell: the
most
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Daπid wrote:
>
> On 2 April 2014 16:06, Sturla Molden wrote:
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > pandas came later and thought ddof=1 is worth more than consistency.
>>
>> Pandas is a data analysis package. NumPy is a numerical array package.
>>
>> I think ddof=1 is justified fo
On 2 April 2014 16:06, Sturla Molden wrote:
> wrote:
>
> > pandas came later and thought ddof=1 is worth more than consistency.
>
> Pandas is a data analysis package. NumPy is a numerical array package.
>
> I think ddof=1 is justified for Pandas, for consistency with statistical
> software (SPSS
12 matches
Mail list logo
