On 31 Mar 2014 19:47, "Chris Barker" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On 29 Mar 2014 20:57, "Chris Barker" wrote:
>> > I think this is somewhat open for discussion -- yes, it's odd, but in
the spirit of practicality beats purity, it seems OK. We could allo
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> On 26.03.2014 16:27, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>> Hi Carl,
>>
>> I installed Python 2.7.6 64 bits on a windows server instance from
>> rackspace cloud and then ran get-pip.py and then could successfully
>> install the numpy and scipy wheel
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> > that part, yes, but isn't Linux too much of a varying target for there
>> > to be
>> > any point anyway?
>>
>> You mean, the /usr/lib stuff varies too much, so that any co
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> > that part, yes, but isn't Linux too much of a varying target for there
> to be
> > any point anyway?
>
> You mean, the /usr/lib stuff varies too much, so that any copied
> dynamic libraries would have little chance of binary compatibility
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> > Bonus question: do you think a similar solution could work for windows
>> > and / or linux?
>>
>> For linux - yes - I think that should be easy with a combination of
>> ``
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> > Bonus question: do you think a similar solution could work for windows
> > and / or linux?
>
> For linux - yes - I think that should be easy with a combination of
> ``ldd`` to find the dependencies and ``patchelf`` to set the rpath to
> po
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On 29 Mar 2014 20:57, "Chris Barker" wrote:
> > I think this is somewhat open for discussion -- yes, it's odd, but in
> the spirit of practicality beats purity, it seems OK. We could allow any TZ
> specifier for that matter -- that's kind
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Olivier Grisel
wrote:
> 2014-03-28 23:13 GMT+01:00 Matthew Brett :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Olivier Grisel
>> wrote:
>>> This is great! Has anyone started to work on OSX whl packages for
>>> scipy? I assume the libgfortran, libquadmath &
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Olivier Grisel
> wrote:
> > 2014-03-31 13:53 GMT+02:00 Olivier Grisel :
> >> 2014-03-28 23:13 GMT+01:00 Matthew Brett :
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Olivier Grisel
> >>> wro
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Olivier Grisel
wrote:
> 2014-03-31 13:53 GMT+02:00 Olivier Grisel :
>> 2014-03-28 23:13 GMT+01:00 Matthew Brett :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Olivier Grisel
>>> wrote:
This is great! Has anyone started to work on OSX whl packages for
2014-03-31 13:53 GMT+02:00 Olivier Grisel :
> 2014-03-28 23:13 GMT+01:00 Matthew Brett :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Olivier Grisel
>> wrote:
>>> This is great! Has anyone started to work on OSX whl packages for
>>> scipy? I assume the libgfortran, libquadmath & libgcc_s dylibs w
2014-03-28 23:13 GMT+01:00 Matthew Brett :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Olivier Grisel
> wrote:
>> This is great! Has anyone started to work on OSX whl packages for
>> scipy? I assume the libgfortran, libquadmath & libgcc_s dylibs will
>> not make it as easy as for numpy. Would it be
12 matches
Mail list logo
