On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> in Pull Request https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3864 Neol Dawe
>> suggested adding new parameters to our `cov` and `corrcoef` functions to
>> implement weights,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> Sebastian Berg wrote:
>
>> I am right now a bit unsure about whether or not the "weights" would be
>> "aweights" or different... R seems to not care about the scale of the
>> weights which seems a bit odd to me for an unbiased estimator? I al
Sturla Molden wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> The only question IMO is which ddof for weighted std, ...
>
> Something like this?
>
> sum_weights - (ddof/float(n))*sum_weights
Please ignore.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://m
Sebastian Berg wrote:
> I am right now a bit unsure about whether or not the "weights" would be
> "aweights" or different... R seems to not care about the scale of the
> weights which seems a bit odd to me for an unbiased estimator? I always
> assumed that we can do the statistics behind using th
On Do, 2014-03-06 at 16:30 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Sebastian Berg
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mi, 2014-03-05 at 10:21 -0800, David Goldsmith wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Date: Wed, 0
On Do, 2014-03-06 at 19:51 +, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > in Pull Request https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3864 Neol Dawe
> > suggested adding new parameters to our `cov` and `corrcoef` functions to
> > implement w
wrote:
> The only question IMO is which ddof for weighted std, ...
Something like this?
sum_weights - (ddof/float(n))*sum_weights
Sturla
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-disc
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> I believe that the wheels built against python.org python will in any
> case work with system python.
>
IIUC, the system python is built agains an up-to-date SDK. so it wouldn't
run on an older OS version -- and why would anyone want it to --
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mi, 2014-03-05 at 10:21 -0800, David Goldsmith wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:45:47 +0100
>> > From: Sebastian Berg
>> > Subject: [Nu
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That would be helpful. Ralf does those now and I suspect he would
>>> welcome the
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> pypi is accepting wheels:
>>
>> http://pythonwheels.com/
>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyzmq/14.0.1
>>
>> Chris B - any comments here?
>
>
> It's my understanding that pypi
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That would be helpful. Ralf does those now and I suspect he would welcome
>> the extra hands. The two sites for release builds are Sourceforge and Pyp
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Mi, 2014-03-05 at 10:21 -0800, David Goldsmith wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:45:47 +0100
> > From: Sebastian Berg
> > Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Adding weights to cov and corrcoef
> > To: numpy-
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> we could use Cython to write some of these things.
>
> So the idea of having a NumPy as a pure C library in the core is abandoned?
And at some point, there was the idea of a numpy_core library that could be
used entirely independently of c
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> pypi is accepting wheels:
>
> http://pythonwheels.com/
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyzmq/14.0.1
>
> Chris B - any comments here?
>
It's my understanding that pypi accepts wheels built for the
python.orgreleases -- and pip should be able t
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> That would be helpful. Ralf does those now and I suspect he would welcome
> the extra hands. The two sites for release builds are Sourceforge and Pypi.
> I don't know if the wheels builds are good enough/accepted on Pypi,
>
Would anyone
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> in Pull Request https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3864 Neol Dawe
>> suggested adding new parameters to our `cov` and `corrcoef` functions to
>> implement weights,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> in Pull Request https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3864 Neol Dawe
> suggested adding new parameters to our `cov` and `corrcoef` functions to
> implement weights, which already exists for `average` (the PR still
> needs to be ad
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Charles R Harris
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
ling, testing, uploading wheels nightly on OSX 10.9:
> >
> > http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/builders/numpy-bdist-whl-osx-2.7
> > http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/builders/numpy-bdist-whl-osx-3.3
> >
> > and downloading, testing built wheels on OSX 10.6:
> >
> > http://nipy.b
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Charles R Harris
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Matthew Brett
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> H
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Matthew Brett
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>>
thanks for the report, thix should be fixed with
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4455
which will be in the final 1.8.1
On 04.03.2014 13:49, Thomas Unterthiner wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I just tried setting up a new installation using numpy 1.8.1rc1 (+scipy
> 0.13.3 and matplotlib 1.3.1). I ran i
On 06.03.2014 19:46, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should [1] be considered a release blocker for 1.8.1?
>
> Skipper
>
> [1] https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/4442
as far as I can tell its a regression of the 1.8.0 release but not the
1.8.1 release so I wouldn't consider it a blocker.
Bu
Hi,
Should [1] be considered a release blocker for 1.8.1?
Skipper
[1] https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/4442
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I built (and tested) some numpy wheels for the rc1:
>> >
>> > http://nipy.bic.berkeley.e
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I built (and tested) some numpy wheels for the rc1:
> >
> > http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/numpy-dist/
>
> Now building, installing, testing, uploading wheels nightl
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:11 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> So this project would have the following goals, depending on how
>> practical this turns out to be: (1) produce a hacky proof-of-concept
>> system for doing the above, (2) turn th
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> 3. Using Cython in the numpy core
>>
>> The numpy core contains tons of complicated C code implementing
>> elaborate operations like indexing, casting, ufunc dispatch, etc. It
>> would be really nice if we could us
On Mi, 2014-03-05 at 10:21 -0800, David Goldsmith wrote:
>
>
>
> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:45:47 +0100
> From: Sebastian Berg
> Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Adding weights to cov and corrcoef
> To: numpy-discussion@scipy.org
> Message-ID: <1394037947.21356.20.came
Please, find below the patch file for numpy 1.8.0
http://pastebin.com/D33fFpjH
On 06/03/14 12:17, Albert Jornet Puig wrote:
Hi All,
I am working with *apply_along_axis* method and I would like to apply
a method that requires to pass named arguments
(scipy.stats.mstats.mquantiles with prob[])
Hi All,
I am working with *apply_along_axis* method and I would like to apply a
method that requires to pass named arguments
(scipy.stats.mstats.mquantiles with prob[]). But currently, it is not
possible with *apply_along_axis*.
I wonder if it would make sense to add the possibility to pass
Am 03.03.2014 um 20:20 schrieb Julian Taylor :
> hi,
>
> as the numpy gsoc topic page is a little short on options I was thinking
> about adding two topics for interested students. But as I have no
> experience with gsoc or mentoring and the ideas are not very fleshed out
> yet I'd like to ask i
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Julian Taylor
> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > as the numpy gsoc topic page is a little short on options I was thinking
> > about adding two topics for interested students. But as I have no
> > experience with gsoc
34 matches
Mail list logo
