Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't aware of this project. While boost.python
is a very nice package, its distributability is nothing short of
nonexistent, so its great to have a pure python binding generator.
One thing which I have often found frustrating is natural ndarray interop
between python a
Hello All,
I am *extremely *pleased to be able to announce the version 0.4 release of
xdress. This version contains much anticipated full support for Clang as a
parser! This is almost entirely due to the efforts of Geoffrey Irving.
Please thank him the next time you get a chance :)
This releas
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Tom Augspurger
wrote:
> Thanks Chris,
>
>
> Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote
>> What python are you using? apparently not a Universal 32+64 bit build. The
>> one Apple delivers?
>
> I'm using homebrew python, so the platform difference seems to have come
> fr
Thanks Chris,
Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote
> What python are you using? apparently not a Universal 32+64 bit build. The
> one Apple delivers?
I'm using homebrew python, so the platform difference seems to have come
from there. I agree about renaming the file as not being a real solution.
I'
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > - convention is the other option:
>> > - use binary wheel for in-house deplyment to similar systems
>> > - use binary wheels for a well-defined python build:
>>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> > - convention is the other option:
> > - use binary wheel for in-house deplyment to similar systems
> > - use binary wheels for a well-defined python build:
> >- for PyPi, that's the python.org builds for Windows and OS-
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Tom Augspurger
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for posting those wheels Matthew.
>>
>> I'm on a Mac (10.9.2) and I had trouble installing numpy from your wheel
>> in
>> a fresh virtualenv with the latests pip, set
Hi,
Arnaud finished that in a different way then we had discussed in the PR.
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4081
Fred
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a PR that fix way too much printing to stdout when finding the
> blas linking information:
>
> h
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Tom Augspurger
wrote:
> Thanks for posting those wheels Matthew.
>
> I'm on a Mac (10.9.2) and I had trouble installing numpy from your wheel in
> a fresh virtualenv with the latests pip, setuptools, and wheel.
>
> ```
> $pip install
> ~/Downloads/numpy-1.8.0.dev_a
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Slavin, Jonathan
wrote:
> This behavior is a property of python slicing. It takes some getting used
> to, but has its advantages.
>
quite a few, actually!
They key with slicing is to think of the index as pointing to the space
between the elements:
0 1 2 3
Thanks for posting those wheels Matthew.
I'm on a Mac (10.9.2) and I had trouble installing numpy from your wheel in
a fresh virtualenv with the latests pip, setuptools, and wheel.
```
$pip install
~/Downloads/numpy-1.8.0.dev_a89a36e-cp27-none-macosx_10_9_intel.whl
numpy-1.8.0.dev_a89a36e-cp27-n
JB wrote:
>
> x = np.array([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10])
>
> If I want the first 5 elements, what do I do?
x[:5]
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Hi,
I have a PR that fix way too much printing to stdout when finding the
blas linking information:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4081
This was created by change in NumPy. I was requested as a comment to
put the removed information in the dict that we return to the user. I
won't have the
JB,
This behavior is a property of python slicing. It takes some getting used
to, but has its advantages. In general in a slice [i:j] the indices go
from i to j-1. In the case that i is 0 it's easy to think of it as j
giving the number of elements (by the way you can also do a[:j] -- i.e.
leavi
On 26 February 2014 00:35, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>
> "simpler" in my original email has to be read as involving less
> operations and thus more efficient, not simpler to understand, indeed it
> is already a simple implementation of the definition. What I would like
> to know is if there are some
Am 25.02.2014 um 12:08 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi :
> Hello,
>
> I'm dealing with an instrument that transfers numerical values through
> an RS232 port in a custom (?) floating point representation (56 bits, 4
> bits exponent and 52 bits significand).
>
> Of course I need to convert this format t
16 matches
Mail list logo
