Re: [Numpy-discussion] argsort speed

2014-02-21 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Julian Taylor > > wrote: > >> > >> On 17.02.2014 15:18, Francesc Alted wrote: > >> > On 2/17/14, 1:08 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] argsort speed

2014-02-21 Thread Ondřej Čertík
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Julian Taylor > wrote: >> >> On 17.02.2014 15:18, Francesc Alted wrote: >> > On 2/17/14, 1:08 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Daπid wrote: >> >>> On 16 Febru

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Header files in windows installers

2014-02-21 Thread Matt Newell
On Friday, February 21, 2014 08:24:15 AM Chris Barker wrote: > > I was unpleasantly surprised to discover that the numpy installers for > > > >> window > >> do not have an option to install the include files, which appear to be > >> all that > >> is needed to compile extensions that use numpy's

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Header files in windows installers

2014-02-21 Thread Chris Barker
> > I was unpleasantly surprised to discover that the numpy installers for >> window >> do not have an option to install the include files, which appear to be >> all that >> is needed to compile extensions that use numpy's C-api. >> > > That would be a bug. They can't all be missing though, becaus

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

2014-02-21 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Jennifer stone wrote: > https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2014 > The link provided by Josef is yet to list SciPy/NumPy under it. Somebody > please contact Terri. > That page acts as major guiding factor for Python-GSoC prospective > students. Please have Sc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Document server error.

2014-02-21 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Didrik Pinte wrote: > > > > On 21 February 2014 16:38, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Didrik Pinte wrote: >> >>> That specific issue is fixed. >>> >>> -- Didrik >>> >>> >>> On 21 February 2014 15:26, Didrik Pinte wrote: >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Document server error.

2014-02-21 Thread Didrik Pinte
On 21 February 2014 16:38, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Didrik Pinte wrote: > >> That specific issue is fixed. >> >> -- Didrik >> >> >> On 21 February 2014 15:26, Didrik Pinte wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 19 February 2014 07:42, Charles R Harris >>> wrote: >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Document server error.

2014-02-21 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Didrik Pinte wrote: > That specific issue is fixed. > > -- Didrik > > > On 21 February 2014 15:26, Didrik Pinte wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 19 February 2014 07:42, Charles R Harris wrote: >> >>> From issue #1951 : >>> >>> T

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Document server error.

2014-02-21 Thread Didrik Pinte
That specific issue is fixed. -- Didrik On 21 February 2014 15:26, Didrik Pinte wrote: > > > > On 19 February 2014 07:42, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> From issue #1951 : >> >> The following URL shows an 500 internal server error: >>> http://docs.scip

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Document server error.

2014-02-21 Thread Didrik Pinte
On 19 February 2014 07:42, Charles R Harris wrote: > From issue #1951 : > > The following URL shows an 500 internal server error: >> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.var.html >> > > Can someone with access to the server take a lo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Default builds of OpenBLAS development branch are now fork safe

2014-02-21 Thread Olivier Grisel
2014-02-20 23:56 GMT+01:00 Carl Kleffner : > Hi, > > 2014-02-20 23:17 GMT+01:00 Olivier Grisel : > >> I had a quick look (without running the procedure) but I don't >> understand some elements: >> >> - apparently you never tell in the numpy's site.cfg nor the scipy.cfg >> to use the openblas lib no

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Automatic issue triage.

2014-02-21 Thread Robert Kern
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Robert Kern gmail.com> writes: > [clip] >> Seems like more trouble than it's worth to automate. We don't want >> just anyone with a Github account to add arbitrary code to our test >> suites, do we? The idea of an "expected failure" test s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OpenBLAS on Mac

2014-02-21 Thread Olivier Grisel
Indeed I just ran the bench on my Mac and OSX Veclib is more than 2x faster than OpenBLAS on such squared matrix multiplication (I just have 2 physical cores on this box). MKL from Canopy Express is slightly slower OpenBLAS for this GEMM bench on that box. I really wonder why Veclib is faster in

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Automatic issue triage.

2014-02-21 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Robert Kern gmail.com> writes: [clip] > Seems like more trouble than it's worth to automate. We don't want > just anyone with a Github account to add arbitrary code to our test > suites, do we? The idea of an "expected failure" test suite is a good > one, but it seems to me that it could be mainta

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Automatic issue triage.

2014-02-21 Thread Robert Kern
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Charles R Harris gmail.com> writes: >> After 6 days of trudging through the numpy issues and >> finally passing the half way point, I'm wondering if we >> can set up so that new defects get a small test that can >> be parsed out and run pe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [JOB ANNOUNCEMENT] Software Developer permanent position

2014-02-21 Thread V. Armando Sole
On 21.02.2014 10:55, David Goldsmith wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:37 PM, wrote: > >> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:43:17 +0100 >> From: "V. Armando Sol?" >> *Ref. 8173* *- Deadline for returning application forms: * >> *01/04/2014* > > I assume thats the European date format, i.e., the due da

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Automatic issue triage.

2014-02-21 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Charles R Harris gmail.com> writes: > After 6 days of trudging through the numpy issues and > finally passing the half way point, I'm wondering if we > can set up so that new defects get a small test that can > be parsed out and run periodically to mark issues that might > be fixed. I expect it ca

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OpenBLAS on Mac

2014-02-21 Thread Jurgen Van Gael
First thing I noticed when installing into /opt/OpenBLAS was that the LAPACK header files were not being copied properly. This was because the OpenBLAS makefile uses the "-D" option in the install command which the default Mac install doesn't support. A quick "brew install coreutils" solved that pr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [JOB ANNOUNCEMENT] Software Developer permanent position

2014-02-21 Thread David Goldsmith
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:37 PM, wrote: > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:43:17 +0100 > From: "V. Armando Sol?" > *Ref. 8173* *- Deadline for returning application forms: * *01/04/2014* > I assume that's the European date format, i.e., the due date is April 1, 2014, not Jan. 4 2014, oui? DG

[Numpy-discussion] dot product by 1*n maxtrix multiply it's transform not equal to raw python dot product?

2014-02-21 Thread Li Li
hi all I am porting some python code to java but got different results. after long time debugging, I found the reason is numpy's result is not the same as java(even the result of raw python codes) one case is: vector:[0.446141, 0.104149996](that's not accurate) it's binary represen

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

2014-02-21 Thread Jennifer stone
https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2014 The link provided by Josef is yet to list SciPy/NumPy under it. Somebody please contact Terri. That page acts as major guiding factor for Python-GSoC prospective students. Please have SciPy listed there. ___