On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 18:20 -0500, alex wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this. You are suggesting that
>> if the svd fails with some kind of exception (possibly poorly or
>> misleadingly worded) then it could be cleaned-
On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 18:20 -0500, alex wrote:
>
> I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this. You are suggesting that
> if the svd fails with some kind of exception (possibly poorly or
> misleadingly worded) then it could be cleaned-up after the fact by
> checking the input, and that this would
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 17:35 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Sebastian Berg
>> >> wrote:
wrote:
> copy of np.pinv used in linear regression
> https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/blob/master/statsmodels/tools/tools.py#L348
> (it's a recent change to streamline some of the linalg in regression,
> and master only)
Why not call lapack routine DGELSS instead? It does exactly this,
On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 17:35 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Sebastian Berg
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 16:37 -0500, alex wrote:
> >> >> H
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:18 PM, alex wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Sebastian Berg
>> wrote:
>>> On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 16:37 -0500, alex wrote:
Hello list,
Here's another idea resurrection from numpy github comments that I've
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
>> On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 16:37 -0500, alex wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> Here's another idea resurrection from numpy github comments that I've
>>> been advised could be posted here for re-discussio
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Sebastian Berg
>> wrote:
>> > On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 16:37 -0500, alex wrote:
>> >> Hello list,
>> >>
>> >> Here's another idea resurrection from numpy github co
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
>> On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 16:37 -0500, alex wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> Here's another idea resurrection from numpy github comments that I've
>>> been advised could be posted here for re-discussio
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
> > On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 16:37 -0500, alex wrote:
> >> Hello list,
> >>
> >> Here's another idea resurrection from numpy github comments that I've
> >> been advised could be posted here for re-disc
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 16:37 -0500, alex wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> Here's another idea resurrection from numpy github comments that I've
>> been advised could be posted here for re-discussion.
>>
>> The proposal would be to make np.linalg.sv
On Sa, 2014-02-15 at 16:37 -0500, alex wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Here's another idea resurrection from numpy github comments that I've
> been advised could be posted here for re-discussion.
>
> The proposal would be to make np.linalg.svd more like scipy.linalg.svd
> with respect to input checking.
Hello list,
Here's another idea resurrection from numpy github comments that I've
been advised could be posted here for re-discussion.
The proposal would be to make np.linalg.svd more like scipy.linalg.svd
with respect to input checking. The argument against the change is
raw speed; if you know
13 matches
Mail list logo
