Sturla Molden wrote:
>
> Yes, it seems to be a GNU problem:
>
> http://bisqwit.iki.fi/story/howto/openmp/#OpenmpAndFork
>
> This Howto also claims Intel compilers is not affected.
It seems another patch has been proposed to the libgomp team today:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
Carl Kleffner wrote:
> If you work in an academia world it can be relevant once third parties
> are involved in a bigger project. A situation may be reached, where you
> just have to prove the license situation of all of your software components.
If you involve third parties outside academia, y
Cannot test right now, but np.unique(b, return_inverse=True)[1].reshape(2,
-1) should do what you are after, I think.
On Feb 2, 2014 11:58 AM, "Mads Ipsen" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have run into a potential 'for loop' bottleneck. Let me outline:
>
> The following array describes bonds (connections) in
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Mads Ipsen wrote:
> Since atoms [1,2,3,7,8] have been
> deleted, the remaining atoms with indices larger than the deleted atoms
> must be decremented.
>
Let
>>> x
array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3],
[ 4, 5, 6, 7],
[ 8, 9, 10, 11]])
and
>>> i = [1, 0, 2]
Hi,
I have run into a potential 'for loop' bottleneck. Let me outline:
The following array describes bonds (connections) in a benzene molecule
b = [[0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 11],
[5, 6, 1, 0, 2, 7, 3, 8, 1, 4, 9, 2, 10, 5, 3, 4, 11, 0,
This sounds like a great and welcome work and improvements.
Does it make sense to also do something about the behavior of advanced
indexing when slices are interleaved between lists and integers.
I know that jay borque has some preliminary work to fix this. There are a
some straightforward fixe
If you work in an academia world it can be relevant once third parties are
involved in a bigger project. A situation may be reached, where you just
have to prove the license situation of all of your software components.
Numpy and scipy is 'selled' as BSD or MIT based foundation for scientific
softw
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> Sebastian has done a lot of work to refactor/rationalize numpy indexing.
> The changes are extensive enough that it would be good to have more public
> review, so here is the release note.
>
> The NumPy indexing has seen a complete rewrit
Sebastian has done a lot of work to refactor/rationalize numpy indexing.
The changes are extensive enough that it would be good to have more public
review, so here is the release note.
The NumPy indexing has seen a complete rewrite in this version. This makes
> most advanced integer indexing opera
Carl Kleffner wrote:
> In the case of numpy-MKL the MKL binaries are statically linked to the
> pyd-files. Given the usefulness, performance and robustness of the
> MKL-based binaries a definite answer to this question would be desirable.
> Say: "Can I use and re-redistribute a product with a pre
Concerning numpy-MKL licence I refer to this question on the Intel Forum:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/topic/328344 "Question on
Redistribution related to numpy/scipy"
In the case of numpy-MKL the MKL binaries are statically linked to the
pyd-files. Given the usefulness, performance an
11 matches
Mail list logo
