On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like we've gotten a bit confused and need to untangle
> something. There's a PR to add new functions 'np.filled' and
> 'np.filled_like':
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2875
> And there was a discussion about th
On 28 June 2013 17:33, Charles R Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Richard Hattersley
> wrote:
>> So:
>> np.array([scalar]) => np.array([scalar], dtype=my_dtype)
>> But:
>> np.array(scalar) => np.array(scalar, dtype=object)
>
> So the scalar case (0 dimensional array) doesn
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Richard Hattersley
wrote:
> On 21 June 2013 19:57, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > You could check the numpy/core/src/umath/test_rational.c.src code to see
> if
> > you are missing something.
>
> In v1.7+ the difference in behaviour between my code and the rational
>
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Richard Hattersley
wrote:
> On 21 June 2013 19:57, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > You could check the numpy/core/src/umath/test_rational.c.src code to see
> if
> > you are missing something.
>
> In v1.7+ the difference in behaviour between my code and the rational
>
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 07:44 -0500, David Cournapeau wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
> It is very last minute, but I have set up a page to coordinate a bit
> scipy 2013's numpy sprints (Friday 28 and Saturday 29th, although I
> may not be there the second day).
>
>
> Depending on the audience, I will als
It is better with a link, sorry about that:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Scipy-2013
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> It is very last minute, but I have set up a page to coordinate a bit scipy
> 2013's numpy sprints (Friday 28 and Saturday 29th, altho
Hi there,
It is very last minute, but I have set up a page to coordinate a bit scipy
2013's numpy sprints (Friday 28 and Saturday 29th, although I may not be
there the second day).
Depending on the audience, I will also look for low hanging fruits. Feel
free to edit the wiki at will
cheers,
Davi
On 21 June 2013 19:57, Charles R Harris wrote:
> You could check the numpy/core/src/umath/test_rational.c.src code to see if
> you are missing something.
In v1.7+ the difference in behaviour between my code and the rational
test case is because my scalar type doesn't subclass np.generic (aka.
PyG
