On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:29:11AM -0400, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> I now see that the polynomial structure is intended to be "rich", as
> opposed to the naïve function that I proposed. In the least, though,
> the documentation could reflect the example you gave me. I could send
> a patch that adds an
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:07:57PM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
> I am trying to find out a way by which I can easily generate the n-th
> order "special" polynomial, where "special" could refer to Hermite,
> Chebyshev etc. Numpy 1.7 introduces several methods for such
> polyno
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Numpy Users,
>
> I am trying to find out a way by which I can easily generate the n-th
> order "special" polynomial, where "special" could refer to Hermite,
> Chebyshev etc. Numpy 1.7 introduces several methods for such
> polynomials, bu
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:59:03PM -0400, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Numpy Users,
>
> I am trying to find out a way by which I can easily generate the n-th
> order "special" polynomial, where "special" could refer to Hermite,
> Chebyshev etc. Numpy 1.7 introduces several methods for such
> polyno
Dear Numpy Users,
I am trying to find out a way by which I can easily generate the n-th
order "special" polynomial, where "special" could refer to Hermite,
Chebyshev etc. Numpy 1.7 introduces several methods for such
polynomials, but I couldn't find a convenience function that gives me
a polynomia
A nice summary of the discussions from a year ago is here:
http://www.numpy.org/NA-overview.html
It provides food for thought.
Eric
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Jaffe wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 22:11, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >> The binaries will still be built against python.org Python, so there
> >> shouldn't be an issue here. Same for building f
On Jun 14, 2013, at 20:23 , Eric Firing wrote:
> On 2013/06/14 7:22 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> On 2013/06/12 2:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Personally I think that overloading np.empty is horribly ugly, will
continue confusin
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> > On 2013/06/12 2:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> Despite heroic efforts on the part of its authors, numpy.ma has a
>> num
On 2013/06/14 7:22 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> On 2013/06/12 2:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> Personally I think that overloading np.empty is horribly ugly, will
>>> continue confusing newbies and everyone else indefinitely, and I'm
>>> 10
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> > On 2013/06/12 2:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> Personally I think that overloading np.empty is horribly ugly, will
> >> continue confusing newbies and everyone else indefinitely,
> On 2013/06/14 5:15 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>> But more important than the name I think
>> is allowing broadcasting of the values,
>> based on NumPy's broadcasting rules.
>> Broadcasting a scalar is then a special case,
>> even if it is the case that has dominated this thread.
On 6/14/2013 1:18
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> > On 2013/06/14 5:15 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> >> On 6/14/2013 9:27 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas wrote:
> >>> If I just saw np.values(..) in some code I would never guess what it
> is doing from t
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 2013/06/12 2:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> Personally I think that overloading np.empty is horribly ugly, will
>> continue confusing newbies and everyone else indefinitely, and I'm
>> 100% convinced that we'll regret implementing such a w
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 2013/06/14 5:15 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>> On 6/14/2013 9:27 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas wrote:
>>> If I just saw np.values(..) in some code I would never guess what it is
>>> doing from the name
>>
>> That suggests np.fromvalues.
>> But more impo
On 2013/06/14 5:15 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> On 6/14/2013 9:27 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas wrote:
>> If I just saw np.values(..) in some code I would never guess what it is
>> doing from the name
>
> That suggests np.fromvalues.
> But more important than the name I think
> is allowing broadcasting of the
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Phil Hodge wrote:
> I would interpret np.filled as a test, asking whether the array is
> filled. If the function is supposed to do something related to
> assigning values, the name should be a verb.
That's a plausible convention, but it's not the convention that
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Jaime Fernández del Río
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like a doc bug. (Probably someone being over-careful -- the
>> default for many operations in numpy is that it's undefined whether
>> they return a view or not, s
On 6/14/2013 9:27 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas wrote:
> If I just saw np.values(..) in some code I would never guess what it is doing
> from the name
That suggests np.fromvalues.
But more important than the name I think
is allowing broadcasting of the values,
based on NumPy's broadcasting rules.
Broadcas
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:06 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> > On 2013/06/13 10:36 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Aldcroft, Thomas
> >> mailto:aldcr...@head.cfa.harvard.edu>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed,
On 14 Jun 2013 09:18, "Arink Verma" wrote:
>
>
>> You're looking for the ProfilerStart/ProfilerStop functions, the
>> former takes a filename to write the profiler to (like "ls.prof" or
>> "x-plus-x.prof"):
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/numpy-discussion@scipy.org/msg41451.html
>
>
> I followed
> You're looking for the ProfilerStart/ProfilerStop functions, the
> former takes a filename to write the profiler to (like "ls.prof" or
> "x-plus-x.prof"):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/numpy-discussion@scipy.org/msg41451.html
I followed that and able to get a callgraph[1], but it doesnt conta
22 matches
Mail list logo
