On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Aldcroft, Thomas
wrote:
> Now I realize what seemed curious. Here is a related example which shows
> that when initializing a numpy array of objects where __getitem__ and
> __len__ exist, np.array introspects the object item values for item in
> range(len(object
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Aldcroft, Thomas <
aldcr...@head.cfa.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Aldcroft, Thomas
>> wrote:
>> > I'm seeing some behavior that I can't understand when creating a numpy
>> arr
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Aldcroft, Thomas
> wrote:
> > I'm seeing some behavior that I can't understand when creating a numpy
> array
> > of Python objects. Basically it seems that np.array() is calling the
> object
> > __getitem__ m
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Aldcroft, Thomas
wrote:
> I'm seeing some behavior that I can't understand when creating a numpy array
> of Python objects. Basically it seems that np.array() is calling the object
> __getitem__ method for one object class but not another class, and I can't
> unde
I think so.
Changing the order between "np.array([1,2,3]) * a" and "a *
np.array([1,2,3])" should return the same type I think, specificaly when
array_priority is defined.
Fred
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Robitaille <
thomas.robitai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Frederic,
>
> On 16 May
I'm seeing some behavior that I can't understand when creating a numpy
array of Python objects. Basically it seems that np.array() is calling the
object __getitem__ method for one object class but not another class, and I
can't understand the difference.
Here is an example, starting with a simple
Hi Frederic,
On 16 May 2013 15:58, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> I looked yesterday rapidly in the code and didn't find the reason (I don't
> know it well, that is probably why).
>
> But last night I think of one possible cause. I found this code 2 times in
> the file core/src/umath/ufunc_object.c:
>
On 30 May 2013 13:44, Neal Becker wrote:
> I thought the topic of this article might be of interest here:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/julia-dev/GAdcYzmibyo
>
>"I think Julia has great potential, and can, unlike Matlab, rid itself of its
>tunnel vision on matrices and e
I thought the topic of this article might be of interest here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/julia-dev/GAdcYzmibyo
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
