Re: [Numpy-discussion] MapIter api

2013-04-15 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 11:16 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Sebastian Berg > > wrote: > > Hey, > > > > the MapIter API has only been made public in master right? So > > it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] MapIter api

2013-04-15 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 11:16 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Sebastian Berg > wrote: > Hey, > > the MapIter API has only been made public in master right? So > it is no > problem at all to change at least the mapiter

Re: [Numpy-discussion] MapIter api

2013-04-15 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > Hey, > > the MapIter API has only been made public in master right? So it is no > problem at all to change at least the mapiter struct, right? > > I got annoyed at all those special cases that make things difficult to > get an idea where t

[Numpy-discussion] MapIter api

2013-04-15 Thread Sebastian Berg
Hey, the MapIter API has only been made public in master right? So it is no problem at all to change at least the mapiter struct, right? I got annoyed at all those special cases that make things difficult to get an idea where to put i.e. to fix the boolean array-like stuff. So actually started re

[Numpy-discussion] Pruned / sparse FFT 2D

2013-04-15 Thread Daπid
Hi, I have a sparse cloud of points of ~10^4 points randomly scattered around a triangular domain [1] from which I want to take the Fourier transform. I have been looking for algorithms and found one library, but only appears to be for the 1-D case (and seems there is no documentation). In [3] the