On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Ralf Gommers
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When should
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> When should we put out 1.7.1? Discuss ;)
>>
>>
>> When we have X times more fixes in maintenanc
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Charles R Harris <
charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Ralf Gommers
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>>
Hello all,
http://numpy.scipy.org is giving a GitHub 404 error.
As this used to be a widely used URL for the project,
and likely appears in many printed references, could
it be fixed to point to or redirect to the (relatively new)
http://www.numpy.org site please?
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Ralf Gommers
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When shou
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> When should we put out 1.7.1? Discuss ;)
>>
>>
>> When we have X times more fixes in maintenanc
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When should we put out 1.7.1? Discuss ;)
>>
>
> When we have X times more fixes in maintenance/1.7.x than the one commit
> with a one-liner fix
So the difference is that I was wanting to make changes in the git repository
that is at version 1.8. I would expect it to still work, though.
I can take a look at the scipy issue.
-Bill
On Feb 26, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Bill Spotz wrote:
> I
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> When should we put out 1.7.1? Discuss ;)
>
When we have X times more fixes in maintenance/1.7.x than the one commit
with a one-liner fix that we have now. Where X is >= 5 at least, unless
there's a very high prio fix that needs releasing
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Bill Spotz wrote:
> I wanted to take a stab at updating numpy.i to not use deprecated NumPy
> C/API code. Nothing in the git logs indicates this has already been done.
> I added
>
> #define NPY_NO_DEPRECATED_API NPY_1_7_API_VERSION
>
> to numpy.i right before it
On 2/26/2013 1:11 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> Alan was in favor of the dot method
I still really like this, and it probably violates
any simple rule for drawing the line.
Nevertheless it would be nice to have some
principle(s) other than the squeaky wheel principle
for thinking about such
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:11 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:33 PM, eat wrote:
>> Huh,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:03 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alan G Isaac
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:33 PM, eat wrote:
> Huh,
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:03 PM, wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alan G Isaac
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm hoping this discussion will return to the drawing
Huh,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:03 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alan G Isaac
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm hoping this discussion will return to the drawing the line question.
> >>
> >>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questi
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>>
>> I'm hoping this discussion will return to the drawing the line question.
>>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8108688/in-python-when-should-i-use-a-function-instead-of-a-meth
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> I'm hoping this discussion will return to the drawing the line question.
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8108688/in-python-when-should-i-use-a-function-instead-of-a-method
>
> Alan Isaac
>
Proposed line:
Reduction methods only.
Disc
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >> i know that the array object is al
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 16:33 +, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Sebastian Berg
>> wrote:
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > currently the `__contains__` method or the `in` operator on arrays, does
>> > not return what
On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 11:16 +0100, Todd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 22:04 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:58 PM,
> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sebasti
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 16:33 +, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > currently the `__contains__` method or the `in` operator on arrays, does
> > not return what the user would expect when in the operation `a in b` the
> > `a`
Is numpy planning to participate in GSOC this year, either on their own or
as a part of another group? If so, should we start trying to get some
project suggestions together?
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 22:04 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:58 PM, wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sebastian Berg
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:50 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrot
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 22:04 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:58 PM, wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sebastian Berg
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:50 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Till Stensitzki
> >>> wr
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Pierre Haessig
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 22/02/2013 17:40, Matthew Brett a écrit :
>> >From complete ignorance, do you think it is an option to allow a
>> (n_left, n_right) tuple as a value for 'mode'?
>>
> That may be an option. Another one would be to add some ki
Hi,
Le 23/02/2013 20:25, Nathaniel Smith a écrit :
> My gut feeling is that we have too many methods on ndarray, not too
> few, but in any case, can you elaborate? What's the rationale for why
> np.abs(a) is so much harder than a.abs(), and why this function and
> not other unary functions?
(Just
Thanks for all the answers, they were helpful!
I was using 1.7.0 and now installed from git:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/archive/master.zip
And it looks like the memory leak is gone, so I guess I was hitting that
known memory leak bug. Thanks!
-Jaakko
On 02/26/2013 09:04 AM, Nathaniel Smith
Hi,
Le 22/02/2013 17:40, Matthew Brett a écrit :
> >From complete ignorance, do you think it is an option to allow a
> (n_left, n_right) tuple as a value for 'mode'?
>
That may be an option. Another one would be to add some kind of `bounds`
option which would be set to None by default but would ac
27 matches
Mail list logo
