Re: [Numpy-discussion] Seeking help and support for next-gen math modeling tools using Python

2013-02-20 Thread Peter Cock
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Peter Cock wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Todd wrote: >>> >>> I am looking at documentation now, but a couple things from what I seen: >>> >>> Are you particularly tied to sourceforge? It seems a lo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Seeking help and support for next-gen math modeling tools using Python

2013-02-20 Thread Robert Kern
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Peter Cock wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Todd wrote: >> >> I am looking at documentation now, but a couple things from what I seen: >> >> Are you particularly tied to sourceforge? It seems a lot of python >> development is moving to github, and it mak

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Seeking help and support for next-gen math modeling tools using Python

2013-02-20 Thread Peter Cock
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Todd wrote: > > I am looking at documentation now, but a couple things from what I seen: > > Are you particularly tied to sourceforge? It seems a lot of python > development is moving to github, and it makes third party contribution much > easier. You can still di

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Seeking help and support for next-gen math modeling tools using Python

2013-02-20 Thread Todd
On Feb 20, 2013 12:47 AM, "Rob Clewley" wrote: > > Hi all, and apologies for a little cross-posting: > > First, thanks to those of you who have used and contributed to the > PyDSTool math modeling environment [1]. This project has greatly > benefitted from the underlying platform of numpy / scipy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pull request: generalized ufunc signature fix and lineal algebra generalized ufuncs

2013-02-20 Thread Oscar Villellas
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Oscar Villellas >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> At Continuum Analytics we've been working on a submodule implementing >>> a set of lineal algebra operati

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pull request: generalized ufunc signature fix and lineal algebra generalized ufuncs

2013-02-20 Thread Oscar Villellas
Hello, I've updated the pull request following feedback: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2954 It caters all the comments raised up-to-now On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Oscar Villellas wrote: > Hello, > > At Continuum Analytics we've been working on a submodule implementing > a set of li

Re: [Numpy-discussion] savetxt trouble

2013-02-20 Thread Fabrice Silva
Le mercredi 20 février 2013 à 13:35 +, Robert Kern a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > > I tried to save a vector as a csv, but it didn't work. > > > > The vector is: > > a[0,0] > > array([-0.70710678-0.70710678j, 0.70710678+0.70710678j, > > 0.70710678-0.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows, blas, atlas and dlls

2013-02-20 Thread Frédéric Bastien
Hi, We also have the same problem for Theano. Having one reusable blas on windows would be useful to many project. Also, if possible try to make it accesible from C,C++ too. Not just cython. Fred On Feb 20, 2013 5:15 AM, "Dag Sverre Seljebotn" wrote: > On 02/20/2013 10:18 AM, Sergio wrote: > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] savetxt trouble

2013-02-20 Thread Neal Becker
Robert Kern wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> I tried to save a vector as a csv, but it didn't work. >> >> The vector is: >> a[0,0] >> array([-0.70710678-0.70710678j, 0.70710678+0.70710678j, >> 0.70710678-0.70710678j, 0.70710678+0.70710678j, > ... >> np.sa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] savetxt trouble

2013-02-20 Thread Robert Kern
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > I tried to save a vector as a csv, but it didn't work. > > The vector is: > a[0,0] > array([-0.70710678-0.70710678j, 0.70710678+0.70710678j, > 0.70710678-0.70710678j, 0.70710678+0.70710678j, ... > np.savetxt ('test.out', a[0,0], deli

[Numpy-discussion] savetxt trouble

2013-02-20 Thread Neal Becker
I tried to save a vector as a csv, but it didn't work. The vector is: a[0,0] array([-0.70710678-0.70710678j, 0.70710678+0.70710678j, 0.70710678-0.70710678j, 0.70710678+0.70710678j, -0.70710678-0.70710678j, 0.70710678-0.70710678j, -0.70710678+0.70710678j, -0.70710678+0.7071

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows, blas, atlas and dlls

2013-02-20 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 02/20/2013 10:18 AM, Sergio wrote: > Dag Sverre Seljebotn astro.uio.no> writes: > >> >> On 02/18/2013 05:26 PM, rif wrote: >>> I have no answer to the question, but I was curious as to why directly >>> calling the cblas would be 10x-20x slower in the first place. That >>> seems surprising, alt

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows, blas, atlas and dlls

2013-02-20 Thread Sergio
V. Armando Solé esrf.fr> writes: > from scipy.linalg.blas import fblas > dgemm = fblas.dgemm._cpointer > sgemm = fblas.sgemm._cpointer > I'm going to try and benchmark it asap. Thanks ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org h

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows, blas, atlas and dlls

2013-02-20 Thread Sergio
Dag Sverre Seljebotn astro.uio.no> writes: > > On 02/18/2013 05:26 PM, rif wrote: > > I have no answer to the question, but I was curious as to why directly > > calling the cblas would be 10x-20x slower in the first place. That > > seems surprising, although I'm just learning about python numer