Re: [Numpy-discussion] [numfocus] Re: A new webpage promoting Compiler technology for CPython

2013-02-16 Thread Fernando Perez
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > If you want to discuss this in public. Let's have the discussion over at > numfo...@googlegroups.com until a more specific list is created. Sounds good. I actually think numfocus is a great list for these kind of 'in-between' discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A new webpage promoting Compiler technology for CPython

2013-02-16 Thread Travis Oliphant
I only meant off the NumPy list as it seems this is off-topic for this forum. I thought I made clear in the rest of the paragraph that we would *love* this contribution. I recommend a pull request. If you want to discuss this in public. Let's have the discussion over at numfo...@googlegroups.c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A new webpage promoting Compiler technology for CPython

2013-02-16 Thread Fernando Perez
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > We should take this discussion off list. Just as a bystander interested in this: why? It seems that OCL is within the scope of what's being proposed and another entrant into the vibrant new world of compiler-extended machinery for fast nu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A new webpage promoting Compiler technology for CPython

2013-02-16 Thread Travis Oliphant
We should take this discussion off list. Please email me directly if you have questions. But, we are open to listing all of these tools. On Feb 16, 2013 10:46 AM, "Massimo DiPierro" wrote: > Thank you. > > Should this be listed: https://github.com/mdipierro/ocl ? > > It is based on meta (which

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A proposed change to rollaxis() behavior for negative 'start' values

2013-02-16 Thread Bradley M. Froehle
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Bradley M. Froehle wrote: > Have you considered using .transpose(...) instead? > My apologies... I didn't read enough of the thread to see what the issue was about. I personally think rollaxis(...) is quite confusing and instead choose to use .transpose(...) fo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A proposed change to rollaxis() behavior for negative 'start' values

2013-02-16 Thread Bradley M. Froehle
Have you considered using .transpose(...) instead? In [4]: a = numpy.ones((3,4,5,6)) In [5]: a.transpose(2,0,1,3).shape Out[5]: (5, 3, 4, 6) In [6]: a.transpose(0,2,1,3).shape Out[6]: (3, 5, 4, 6) In [7]: a.transpose(0,1,2,3).shape Out[7]: (3, 4, 5, 6) In [8]: a.transpose(0,1,3,2).shape Out[8]

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A new webpage promoting Compiler technology for CPython

2013-02-16 Thread Massimo DiPierro
Thank you. Should this be listed: https://github.com/mdipierro/ocl ? It is based on meta (which is listed) and pyopencl (which is listed, only used to run with opencl) and has some overlap with Cython and Pyjamas although it is not based on any of them. It is minimalist in scope: it only cover

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.7.0 for MeeGo Harmattan OS

2013-02-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Roberto Colistete Jr. < roberto.colist...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It is my first participation here. > > About NumPy on Mobile OS : > - NumPy 1.7.0 was released today (11/02/2013) for MeeGo Harmattan OS > (for Nokia N9/N950), just 1 day after th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A new webpage promoting Compiler technology for CPython

2013-02-16 Thread Ronan Lamy
Le 16/02/2013 16:08, Massimo DiPierro a écrit : > Sorry for injecting... Which page is this about? http://compilers.pydata.org/ Cf. the post I answered to. > On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Ronan Lamy wrote: > >> Le 15/02/2013 07:11, Travis Oliphant a écrit : >> >>> This page is specifically for Com

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A new webpage promoting Compiler technology for CPython

2013-02-16 Thread Massimo DiPierro
Sorry for injecting... Which page is this about? On Feb 16, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Ronan Lamy wrote: > Le 15/02/2013 07:11, Travis Oliphant a écrit : > >> This page is specifically for Compiler projects that either integrate >> with or work directly with the CPython run-time which is why PyPy is not

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A new webpage promoting Compiler technology for CPython

2013-02-16 Thread Ronan Lamy
Le 15/02/2013 07:11, Travis Oliphant a écrit : > This page is specifically for Compiler projects that either integrate > with or work directly with the CPython run-time which is why PyPy is not > presently listed. The PyPy project is a great project but we just felt > that we wanted to explicitly