Thanks for providing this. Reference is excellent, especially as I was
collecting Fortran and f2py resources, some month ago, and I found nothing
similar to answers you expose.
Side by side syntax is just great and intuitive
And rest is...
Thanks
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ondřej Čertík wr
Hi Wes,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> hi all,
>
> We've released pandas 0.10.1 which includes many bug fixes from
> 0.10.0 (including a number of issues with the new file parser,
> e.g. reading multiple files in separate threads), various
> performance improvements, and m
Frédéric,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just read a paper[1] that compare python with numpy or pypy vs c++ and
> fortran from a code, memory and speed point of view. The python code was
> still better as you can't have list of ndarray in fortran and some oth
On 2/6/2013 7:10 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second release candidate of
> NumPy 1.7.0rc2.
>
> Sources and binary installers can be found at
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.0rc2/
>
> We have fixed all issues known to us
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> a) If we cannot build Scipy now, it may or may not be acceptable to
>> release numpy now. I think it is, you (Ralf) think it isn't, we
>> haven't discussed that. It
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> >> Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy build?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > That doesn't sound li
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> a) If we cannot build Scipy now, it may or may not be acceptable to
>> release numpy now. I think it is, you (Ralf) think it isn't, we
>> haven't discussed that.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> a) If we cannot build Scipy now, it may or may not be acceptable to
> release numpy now. I think it is, you (Ralf) think it isn't, we
> haven't discussed that. It may not come up.
Is anyone suggesting we hold the whole release for this? I
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >> Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy build?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > That doe
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy build?
>> >
>> >
>> > That doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
>>
>> I must say I'm a little confused as to how
Hi,
I just read a paper[1] that compare python with numpy or pypy vs c++ and
fortran from a code, memory and speed point of view. The python code was
still better as you can't have list of ndarray in fortran and some other
stuff was harder to do. The fastest was fortran, then C++, but pypy around
Hi,
I have recently setup a page about modern Fortran:
http://fortran90.org/
and in particular, it has a long section with side by side syntax
examples of Python/NumPy vs Fortran:
http://fortran90.org/src/rosetta.html
I would be very interested if some NumPy gurus would provide me
feedback. I
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy build?
>> >
>> >
>> > That doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
>>
>> I must say I'm a little confused as to how we'r
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>
> >> Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy build?
> >
> >
> > That doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
>
> I must say I'm a little confused as to how we're going to make the
> decisions here.
>
How about: attempt to reach conse
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I think you will need a developer's license for MKL for Numpy. Ralf -
>>> any ETA for those?
>>
>>
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think you will need a developer's license for MKL for Numpy. Ralf -
>> any ETA for those?
>
>
> No, I'll have to ask again.
>
>>
>> I think I'm right in thinking yo
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think you will need a developer's license for MKL for Numpy. Ralf -
>> any ETA for those?
>
>
> No, I'll have to ask again.
>
>>
>> I think I'm right in thinking yo
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>
> I think you will need a developer's license for MKL for Numpy. Ralf -
> any ETA for those?
>
No, I'll have to ask again.
> I think I'm right in thinking you'll need a Fortran compiler for Scipy
> but not Numpy?
Correct.
> Can we defe
Hi,
As expected all Theano's tests passed.
thanks
Fred
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second release candidate of
> NumPy 1.7.0rc2.
>
> Sources and binary installers can be found at
> https://sourceforge.net/proj
On 2/6/2013 10:35 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Christoph,
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> [...]
>>> In order not to leave this discussion without a resolution:
>>>
>>> Christophe - would you allow us to distribute your numpy binaries for
>>> 1.7 from the numpy sourcefor
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Ondřej Čertík
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
On 02/07/2013 12:16 AM, Matthew B
21 matches
Mail list logo
