Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Ondřej Čertík > wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >> wrote: >>> On 02/07/2013 12:16 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> [...] Can you clarify the people you think will get

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

Hi, On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn > wrote: >> On 02/07/2013 12:16 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > [...] >>> Can you clarify the people you think will get stuck? I think I'm >>> right in saying that anyone with a C extensi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Will numpy 1.7.0 final be binary compatible with the rc?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Peter Cock wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Peter Cock >>> wrote: Hello all, Will the numpy 1.7.0 'final' be binary compat

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

Christoph, On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: [...] >> In order not to leave this discussion without a resolution: >> >> Christophe - would you allow us to distribute your numpy binaries for >> 1.7 from the numpy sourceforge page? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew > > > I am OK wit

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 02/07/2013 12:16 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: [...] >> Can you clarify the people you think will get stuck? I think I'm >> right in saying that anyone with a C extension should be able to build >> them against numpy, by installing the f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

Hi, On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 02/07/2013 12:16 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Matthew Brett >>> wrote: Hi, On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On 02/07/2013 12:16 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Gommers >>> wrote: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.0rc2 release

Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second release candidate of NumPy 1.7.0rc2. Sources and binary installers can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.0rc2/ We have fixed all issues known to us since the 1.7.0rc1 release. Please test this release an

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Can you clarify the people you think will get stuck? I think I'm > right in saying that anyone with a C extension should be able to build > them against numpy, by installing the free (as-in-beer) MS tools? yup -- and that's the recommended

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

Hi, On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Matthew Brett >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

I'm trying to weed out the issues here: 1) what should the binary installer for Windows look like: * bdist_wininst is the obvious choice but apparently has issues with the newer Windows security stuff -- the real solution is for distutils to be fixed/use something else/ etc -- but is there any

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > >> > On 2/5/2013 10:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Dealing with the mode argument in qr.

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Bradley M. Froehle wrote: > > This would be a problem imho. But I don't see why you can't add "raw" to >>> numpy's qr. And if you add "big" and "thin" in numpy, you can add those >>> modes in scipy too. >>> >> >> Currently I've used bfroehle's suggestions, although

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Dealing with the mode argument in qr.

> This would be a problem imho. But I don't see why you can't add "raw" to >> numpy's qr. And if you add "big" and "thin" in numpy, you can add those >> modes in scipy too. >> > > Currently I've used bfroehle's suggestions, although I'm tempted by 'thin' > instead of 'reduced' > Thin sounds fine t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Where's that function?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:08 PM, wrote: >> >> I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of >> interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to >> take. >> I thought that's very useful, but didn't m

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Dealing with the mode argument in qr.

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> This post is to bring the discussion of PR >>> #2965

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

Hi, On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> > On 2/5/2013 10:51 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, M

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Where's that function?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:08 PM, wrote: > I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of > interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to > take. > I thought that's very useful, but didn't make a note. > > Now, I have no idea where I saw this (I thought nu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On 6 February 2013 01:55, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >>> 4) Numpy-MKL requires the Intel runtime DLLs (MKL is linked statically >>> btw). I ship those with the installers and append the directory >>> containing the DLLs to os.environ['

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Where's that function?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 13:08 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >> I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of >> interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to >> take. >> I thought that's very use

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Where's that function?

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 13:08 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of > interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to > take. > I thought that's very useful, but didn't make a note. > > Now, I have no idea where I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Dealing with the mode argument in qr.

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> This post is to bring the discussion of PR >> #2965to the attention of the list. >> Ther

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > On 2/5/2013 10:51 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Ch

[Numpy-discussion] Where's that function?

I'm convinced that I saw a while ago a function that uses a list of interval boundaries to index into an array, either to iterate or to take. I thought that's very useful, but didn't make a note. Now, I have no idea where I saw this (I thought numpy), and I cannot find it anywhere. any clues? Th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Any plans for windows 64-bit installer for 1.7?

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > easy_install can install into virtualenvs from bdist_wininst > installers, at least the ones I have built... really? cool! I never thought to try that! Thanks, -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Divi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Dealing with the mode argument in qr.

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > This post is to bring the discussion of PR > #2965to the attention of the list. > There are at least three issues in play here. > > 1) The PR adds modes 'big' and 'thin' to the current

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issues to fix for 1.7.0rc2.

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn < d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no> wrote: > On 02/06/2013 08:41 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Jason Grout > > mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com>> > wrote: > > > > On 2/6/13 12:46 AM, Charles R Harris wr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building numpy for python3.3: No _numpyconfig.h

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 13:31 +, gk230-free...@yahoo.de wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently trying to build numpy 1.6.2 for python python 3.3 from ports on > FreeBSD. Unfortunately, the setup.py execution fails because some [1] gcc > command trying to access _numpyconfig.h fails since _numpyconfig.

[Numpy-discussion] Building numpy for python3.3: No _numpyconfig.h

Hi, I'm currently trying to build numpy 1.6.2 for python python 3.3 from ports on FreeBSD. Unfortunately, the setup.py execution fails because some [1] gcc command trying to access _numpyconfig.h fails since _numpyconfig.h is not generated from _numpyconfig.h.in. How do I manually build the pro

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issues to fix for 1.7.0rc2.

On 6 February 2013 08:41, Charles R Harris wrote: > > More Python craziness > > In [6]: print None or 0 > 0 > > In [7]: print 0 or None > None Just for clarifying this behaviour: In [1]: print None or 0 0 In [2]: print 0 or None None In [3]: val = 0 or None In [4]: print val None

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Will numpy 1.7.0 final be binary compatible with the rc?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Peter Cock >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Will the numpy 1.7.0 'final' be binary compatible with the release >>> candidate(s)? i.e. Would it be saf

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issues to fix for 1.7.0rc2.

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 10:18 +0100, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 02/06/2013 08:41 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Jason Grout > > mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com>> wrote: > > > > On 2/6/13 12:46 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > if we decide t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issues to fix for 1.7.0rc2.

On 02/06/2013 08:41 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Jason Grout > mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com>> wrote: > > On 2/6/13 12:46 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > if we decide to do so > > I should mention that we don't really depend on either behavior