Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: scikit-learn 0.13 released!

2013-01-21 Thread Olivier Grisel
Congrats and thanks to Andreas and everyone involved in the release, the website fixes and the online survey setup. I posted Andreas blog post on HN and reddit: - http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5094319 - http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/170oty/scikitlearn_013_is_out_machine_lear

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: scikit-learn 0.13 released!

2013-01-21 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hi all. I am very happy to announce the release of scikit-learn 0.13. New features in this release include feature hashing for text processing, passive-agressive classifiers, faster random forests and many more. There have also been countless improvements in stability, consistency and usability.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Do we want scalar casting to behave as it does at the moment?

2013-01-21 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote: > 2013/1/18 Matthew Brett : >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Olivier Delalleau wrote: Le vendredi 18 janvier 2013, Chris Barker - NOAA Feder

Re: [Numpy-discussion] another little index puzzle

2013-01-21 Thread Henry Gomersall
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 08:41 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > I have an array to be used for indexing. It is 2d, where the rows are > all the > permutations of some numbers. So: > > array([[-2, -2, -2], >[-2, -2, -1], >[-2, -2, 0], >[-2, -2, 1], >[-2, -2, 2], > ...

Re: [Numpy-discussion] another little index puzzle

2013-01-21 Thread Robert Kern
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > I have an array to be used for indexing. It is 2d, where the rows are all the > permutations of some numbers. So: > > array([[-2, -2, -2], >[-2, -2, -1], >[-2, -2, 0], >[-2, -2, 1], >[-2, -2, 2], > ... >

[Numpy-discussion] another little index puzzle

2013-01-21 Thread Neal Becker
I have an array to be used for indexing. It is 2d, where the rows are all the permutations of some numbers. So: array([[-2, -2, -2], [-2, -2, -1], [-2, -2, 0], [-2, -2, 1], [-2, -2, 2], ... [ 2, 1, 2], [ 2, 2, -2], [ 2, 2, -1], [ 2

Re: [Numpy-discussion] New numpy functions: filled, filled_like

2013-01-21 Thread Pierre Haessig
Le 18/01/2013 23:22, Matthew Brett a écrit : > I personally find 'fill' OK. I'd read: > > a = np.empty((10, 10), fill=np.nan) > > as > > "make an empty array shape (10, 10) and fill with nans" +1 (and now we have *two* verbs ! ) -- Pierre signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature