Re: [Numpy-discussion] help with f2py

2012-12-23 Thread Ondřej Čertík
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Aronne Merrelli wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to run f2py and running into some trouble. Starting from > http://www.scipy.org/Cookbook/F2Py, and the very simple 'Wrapping Hermite > Polynomial' example, I can get the pyf file created with no issues. The > system I am

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Many failing doctests - release blocker? Enable for default test runs?

2012-12-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I noticed that enabling the doctests on the 1.7.x maintenance branch > > caused lots and lots of doctest failures. > > > > (np-devel)[mb312@blair ~/dev_t

[Numpy-discussion] help with f2py

2012-12-23 Thread Aronne Merrelli
Hi, I'm trying to run f2py and running into some trouble. Starting from http://www.scipy.org/Cookbook/F2Py, and the very simple 'Wrapping Hermite Polynomial' example, I can get the pyf file created with no issues. The system I am using is RedHat linux, and has several Fortran compilers: $ f2py -c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Future of numpy (was: DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch)

2012-12-23 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> Travis - I think you are suggesting that there should be no one >>> person in charge of numpy, and I think th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Many failing doctests - release blocker? Enable for default test runs?

2012-12-23 Thread Ondřej Čertík
Hi Matthew, On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that enabling the doctests on the 1.7.x maintenance branch > caused lots and lots of doctest failures. > > (np-devel)[mb312@blair ~/dev_trees]$ python -c 'import numpy as np; > np.test(doctests=True)' > 1.7.0rc1

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Future of numpy (was: DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch)

2012-12-23 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 12/22/2012 06:36 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Matthew Brett >>> wrote: Travis - I think you are suggesting that ther

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Future of numpy (was: DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch)

2012-12-23 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 12/22/2012 06:36 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> Travis - I think you are suggesting that there should be no one >>> person in charge of numpy, and I think this is very