On Dec 21, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Collin Sellman wrote:
> Thanks, Wes and team. I've been looking through the new features, but
> haven't found any documentation on the integration with the Google Analytics
> API. I was just in the midst of trying to pull data into Pandas from GA in
> v.0.9.0, s
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Ondřej Čertík
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed that the 3.1 tests are now failing. After clarification with
>> the Travis guys:
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/travis-ci/02iRu6kmwY8/discussion
>>
>
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the 3.1 tests are now failing. After clarification with
> the Travis guys:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/travis-ci/02iRu6kmwY8/discussion
>
> I've submitted a fix to our .travis.yml (and backported to 1.7):
>
>
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the 3.1 tests are now failing. After clarification with
> the Travis guys:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/travis-ci/02iRu6kmwY8/discussion
>
> I've submitted a fix to our .travis.yml (and backported to 1.7):
>
>
Thanks
But I could find for Win64 bit windows
Second question: Did you mean that I have to put lens limits of those
number???
Пятница, 21 декабря 2012, 15:45 UTC от Pauli Virtanen :
>Hi,
>
>Your code tries to to evaluate
>
>z = 1263309.3633394379 + 101064.74910119522j
>jv(536, z)
Hello,
On Dec/2/2012 I sent an email about some meaningful speed problems I was
facing when porting our core program from Numeric (Python 2.2) to Numpy
(Python 2.6). Some of our tests went from 30 seconds to 90 seconds for
example.
I saw interest from some people in this list and I left the t
Hi,
Your code tries to to evaluate
z = 1263309.3633394379 + 101064.74910119522j
jv(536, z)
# -> (inf+inf*j)
In reality, this number is not infinite, but
jv(536, z) == -2.3955170861527422e+43888 + 9.6910119847300024e+43887
These numbers (~ 10^43888) are too large for the floatin
I think you advised about the code which is the same appearance.
==
Problem is not here Sir
I will give you exactly what I was talking about. I have ready codes already(It
would be kind of you if you checked the following
Received from Pauli Virtanen on Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 08:59:02AM EST:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn astro.uio.no> writes:
> [clip]
> > Do you have an implemention of the Bessel functions that work as you
> > wish in C or Fortran? If so, that could be wrapped and called from Python.
>
> For spherical Bes
Dag Sverre Seljebotn astro.uio.no> writes:
[clip]
> Do you have an implemention of the Bessel functions that work as you
> wish in C or Fortran? If so, that could be wrapped and called from Python.
For spherical Bessel functions it's possible to also use the relation
to Bessel functions, which h
On 12/21/2012 02:30 PM, Happyman wrote:
> I have everything in C or Fortran...According to my friends
> recommendations I started learning Python for my research...
>
> Do you mean the functions which gave Nan result has not been developed
> properly yet in Python, Don't you
The way most of Nu
I have everything in C or Fortran...According to my friends recommendations I
started learning Python for my research...
Do you mean the functions which gave Nan result has not been developed properly
yet in Python, Don't you
For about 1.5 months I have been facing the same problem for Bes
Happyman mail.ru> writes:
> Thanks Pauli But I have already very shortly built for bessel
> function, but the code you gave me is in Fortran.. I also used
> f2py but I could not manage to read fortran codes..that is why
> I have asked in Python what is wrong??
That Fortran code is `sph_jn`, whic
Thanks Pauli
But I have already very shortly built for bessel function, but the code you
gave me is in Fortran.. I also used f2py but I could not manage to read fortran
codes..that is why I have asked in Python what is wrong??
Пятница, 21 декабря 2012, 12:46 UTC от Pauli Virtanen :
>Happyman
On 12/21/12 1:35 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 12/20/2012 03:23 PM, Francesc Alted wrote:
>> On 12/20/12 9:53 AM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 19:03 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
The only scenario that I see that this would create unaligned arrays
is
for mac
Happyman mail.ru> writes:
[clip]
> IF I GIVE ( it is necessary value for my program ):
> a , b = sph_jn ( 536 , 2513.2741228718346 + 201.0619298974676j )
The implementation of the spherical Bessel functions is through
this Fortran code:
https://github.com/scipy/scipy/blob/master/scipy/special/s
On 12/20/2012 03:23 PM, Francesc Alted wrote:
> On 12/20/12 9:53 AM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 19:03 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
>>> The only scenario that I see that this would create unaligned arrays
>>> is
>>> for machines having AVX. But provided that the Intel architect
On 12/21/12 11:58 AM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 11:34 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
>>> Also this convolution code:
>>> https://github.com/hgomersall/SSE-convolution/blob/master/convolve.c
>>>
>>> Shows a small but repeatable speed-up (a few %) when using some
>> aligned
>>> loa
DEAR PYTHON USERS
DO MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS HAVE LIMITATION IN PYTHON in comparison with other
programming languages
I have two mathematical functions:
from scipy.special import sph_jn, sph_jnyn
1) sph_jn (n, z) ---> n is float, z is complex number for example: a,b=sph_jn
( 2.0 , 5+0
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 11:34 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
> > Also this convolution code:
> > https://github.com/hgomersall/SSE-convolution/blob/master/convolve.c
> >
> > Shows a small but repeatable speed-up (a few %) when using some
> aligned
> > loads (as many as I can work out to use!).
>
> Oka
On 12/20/12 7:35 PM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 15:23 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
>> On 12/20/12 9:53 AM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 19:03 +0100, Francesc Alted wrote:
The only scenario that I see that this would create unaligned
>> arrays
is
>>>
On Dec 20, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Travis - I think you are suggesting that there should be no one
>> person in charge of numpy, and I think this is very unlikely to work
>> well. Perhaps there are good examples o
22 matches
Mail list logo